Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The accurate term "homosexual" bothers them. Good -- I'll make sure to use it instead of the euphemism "gay".
1 posted on 03/23/2014 7:31:00 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: reaganaut1

Sodomite is really the correct word to use in this context. More insane ‘Newspeak’ from the libtards over at NYT and their various associates.

This is a little like the term ‘woman’ being phased out in favor of ‘chick’ or something ridiculous.

You have to shake your head at the section in which a Marxist professor proclaims he ‘corrects’ his students when they use the term ‘homosexual’. Well, Ernst Roehm and his merry band of Brownshirts would definitely be proud of this peon. Keep your kids out of public schools and these kinds of colleges. Totally infiltrated with filth.

Don’t forget, ‘pedophile’ may one day be an offensive term. It will give way to some softer term.


30 posted on 03/23/2014 7:49:40 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I guess the language police want us to stop using the word “homosexual” which means I will go out of my way to use it to describe said homos lol


33 posted on 03/23/2014 7:53:41 PM PDT by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Let me teach them an easier word to get used to ... it only has three syllables, so even the dumbest in our self-absorbed culture should be able to say it - SODOMITE ...

How about this one?

Dk smokin, turd burglarin, butt pirate!


34 posted on 03/23/2014 7:54:16 PM PDT by WTFOVR (I find myself exclaiming that expression quite often these days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I guess fudgepacker is verboten too?


39 posted on 03/23/2014 7:58:58 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I always try to show respect by struggling out the entire five syllables of Homosexual(ity) but
if they want we can just revert to the much-easier terms of endearment, so to speak...
such as
h...
and
f..
and
p...

hey, they’re all uni-syllabic. The kind of words that so many of today’s journalists should be most comfortable with, eh?


40 posted on 03/23/2014 7:58:59 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
i think Filthy disease Ridden Queer is the best description...
43 posted on 03/23/2014 8:02:24 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

> The accurate term “homosexual” bothers them. Good — I’ll make sure to use it instead of the euphemism “gay”.

They brought it on themselves by attacking good God-fearing people and trying to force them to accept a perverted version of marriage, gay boyscouts that no troop will ever see to find a new source of young boys to exploit and try to convert / pedophelia, services and cater to them against their own beliefs, watching them dress in drag on television shows and parades, among other detestable things...


48 posted on 03/23/2014 8:10:46 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I’m offended that they changed the meaning of the word “gay”.

As for “colored people”, tell it to the NAACP.


52 posted on 03/23/2014 8:16:18 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Homosexual is the term I use when I am not swearing at or about dome damfool thing one or more of these queer people have done or are doing.

Then the language gets rough!

But I NEVER refer to them as “gay!”


53 posted on 03/23/2014 8:18:12 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

True story: I was subbing in a 3rd grade class. We were finding words that rhymed with may. One of the boys said “gay” and the class irrupted into what sounded like a Beavis and Butthead cartoon. I told them that the word ‘gay’ means happy, joyful. They were shocked. No one told them the word had a different meaning.

Later, I wrote the word ‘homophone’, separated homo from phone and explained that homo means same. Not one reaction from the kids. They don’t know the word ‘homo’ and don’t seem to be able to make the connection.


54 posted on 03/23/2014 8:20:28 PM PDT by stansblugrassgrl (PRAISE THE LORD AND PASS THE AMMUNITION!!! YEEEEEHAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
They want to say this is not normal sex

Actually, it's not sex at all, from a physiological or common-sense standpoint.

Only one activity involving male and female genitalia qualifies as sex.

Besides, their hero Bill Clinton wouldn't have had an excuse if he didn't follow this same strict definition!

56 posted on 03/23/2014 8:21:38 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Newspeak. George Orwell, please pick up the white courtesy phone.


59 posted on 03/23/2014 8:34:25 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I was commenting on an article (not here) about two gay men trying to adopt a four year old boy and one of the other posters, who I assumed was gay, went absolutely crazy on me for continuing to use the word “homosexual”. He tried to have me banned, which failed. One thing is sure-he hated the word homosexual and I’m sure he’s not alone.


60 posted on 03/23/2014 8:42:06 PM PDT by Larry381 (It don't matter what you say.....I'm offended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

“Homosexual” is a contrived term that is only about 130 years old, IIRC. We can actually do without it.

Sodomy activists, fornication activists, adultery activists, and contraception activists are all really in the same business: attacking chastity, or, if you will, continence.

So they are ALL the “Incontinence Movement.”


61 posted on 03/23/2014 8:55:27 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The word homosexual is as wrong as the word gay. I use it because everyone uses it but its the wrong word. Homosexual is a clinical description of a sex act - homosexual sex, it is not a valid name for a group of people. Gay is a PC term. F*ggot is vulgar, something trashy people call each other during bar fights. Sodomite in my view is the best terminology, atleast most Bible accurate, person experiencing same sex attraction is probably the best scientific formulation.


62 posted on 03/23/2014 9:00:13 PM PDT by BurningOak (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2830849/reply?c=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Just call them what they are, QUEERS!


64 posted on 03/23/2014 9:13:41 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
...looked at the way the term is used by those who try to portray gays and lesbians as deviant.

We don't have to try, they do it themselves. But there is the rub. They don't care about the words we use, its that we think of them, accurately, as being deviant. To them its ThoughtCrime that must be eliminated.

66 posted on 03/23/2014 9:30:20 PM PDT by Count of Monte Fisto (The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Indeed, until approx. a century ago, the word homosexual (or heterosexual) simply did not exist.

There was simply the act of sodomy, which was a sin - and a crime. One either did the act, or one did not. Like theft or lying. It was not considered to define a person and was not an all-encompassing lifestyle or category as it is now - as mentioned, the words did not exist. It took the beginning of psychology to give us the words of homo or heterosexual.


67 posted on 03/23/2014 9:34:01 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I just call them FAGS or HOMOS. In the case of the female perverts, I just call them DYKES or LESBOS.


72 posted on 03/23/2014 10:06:18 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Where’s that Andrew Dice Clay quote? “They are too sensitive man. They don’t know if they want to be called gays, fairies, homosexuals. I call them c-suckers. I think that about spells it out. “


73 posted on 03/23/2014 10:15:39 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson