Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lt. Gen. McInerney Says MH370 Is In Pakistan – ‘I Got A Source That Confirmed It Yesterday’ (Video)
Counterjihadreport.com ^ | March 22, 2014 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 03/23/2014 1:06:32 PM PDT by txgirl4Bush

“LIGNET put out a report, substantiated yesterday, that there sources got their information from Boeing sources, which is covert. Not that they got their information from the Boeing Company because they’re involved in the investigation, that the airplane was in Pakistan. That was confirmed by LIGNET on Monday and I got another source at LIGNET that confirmed it yesterday… I do believe that those people in Pakistan, in the ISI, those people who knew where Osama Bin Laden was and didn’t tell us. I believe those same elements could be involved with getting that airplane into a Pakistan air force base.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boeing; iran; lignet; malaysia; mcinerney; mh370; pakistan; planehijack; postit9moretimes; thomasmcinerney; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 next last
To: okie01
Skardu.....11944........8200

Of the four, Skardu is the easternmost and the most remote.

Even at that high elevation, the 12,000 feet would allow a loaded 777 to take off again. The other ones, not so much.

181 posted on 03/23/2014 7:03:14 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: xzins

>> “What’s the danger if that plane is ditched in the Indian Ocean? Nada.” <<

.
Thus wishful thinking for most, and a great scam for the quacks in the west wing.
.


182 posted on 03/23/2014 7:04:37 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

What’s you game?


183 posted on 03/23/2014 7:07:26 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
What’s you game?

No one CAN ever win on FR with this approach, even when he relentlessly speaks the truth about what little he really knows. Care to revisit the Greg Laurie thread now that things are winding down here? R2z
184 posted on 03/23/2014 7:15:31 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

Although China is a tyrannical regime clearly and has treated its people brutally in the past and present, I’d think if outsiders mess big time with Chinese citizens, there might be quite a bit of retaliation. So, I’m skeptical of those who say the Terrorists would murder them.


185 posted on 03/23/2014 7:17:52 PM PDT by BeadCounter (morning glory evening grace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
No, the sat doesn’t have an accurate distance to the aircraft.

So then you are saying that Boeing and Inmarsat are lying to us and the 14 nations searching the seas off of Australia???

Is that what you are saying???

186 posted on 03/23/2014 7:24:12 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: exit82
The other ones, not so much.

Precisely.

If the plane is in Pakistan, Skardu would be a good place to start looking.

187 posted on 03/23/2014 7:25:48 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
You have no idea of how far off the synchronization is.

What synchronization would that be?

The only relevant delay is how long it takes the gadget on the airplane to turn around a ping. And, since Inmarsat probably supplies the box, they would have a good read on that. And, if not, Boeing would know where to get the information. After that, it's easy: Time the ping response, subtract out turn around delay, divide by two, and multiply by the speed of light.

188 posted on 03/23/2014 7:31:32 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Simulated landing of a 787 at Skardu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9sbH5BUuNw
189 posted on 03/23/2014 7:41:19 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Why couldn’t the 777 avionics provide lat/lon/el as part of the data sent to the sat?


190 posted on 03/23/2014 7:42:04 PM PDT by CodeToad (Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JDMcpspxhg

Air view of Skardu 2011

Looks like it was taken from a helicopter.

Very mountainous area. Great opportunities for terrain masking.


191 posted on 03/23/2014 7:51:21 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Why couldn’t the 777 avionics provide lat/lon/el as part of the data sent to the sat?

The satellite transceiver is apparently one of several channels systems on the airplane can use to report information to ground. Whoever stole the plane apparently turned off the relevant systems but did not know enough also to disable the satcom they use.

The satcom is not avionics. But it still communicates with the satellite once per hour, even if it has no traffic to send. The time taken by those exchanges allowed Inmarsat to work out the plane's distance from the satellite at the time of each such communication.

192 posted on 03/23/2014 8:06:10 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: fso301

China wouldn’t take it, as bad as a regime as they have been, present and past. Treating their citizens like this, if they were murdered smacks to me of Nanking. Sure, the Chinese kill their own people and made them suffer famine in the past but that wouldn’t give foreigners the right to mess them over. Even if China doesn’t have as good of intelligence as we or Israel have, I’d think they could still be effective.


193 posted on 03/23/2014 8:07:18 PM PDT by BeadCounter (morning glory evening grace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
Simulated landing of a 787 at Skardu

The approach is a bit cozy, but there's plenty of room for a 777.

I don't see a single hangar on the property, however -- nothing to stash the plane in and hide it from view.

194 posted on 03/23/2014 8:28:09 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; Gen.Blather
Do you mean one of its remote mountain roads?

You don't know much about flying do you.

195 posted on 03/23/2014 8:47:01 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: txgirl4Bush

The government knows almost exactly what route this plane took based on the six or seven hours of satellite pings it received - it knew the precise locations of the satellite each time it got a ping, and could calculate the distance of the satellite to the plane by the timing of the pings - assuming a flight path of average cruising speed with relatively negligible variations in speed and altitude, it should have been possible to use the different locations of the satellite to triangulate the plane’s location within a narrow band, surely enough to differentiate whether it went west or south - I’m guessing the smoke about where it’s really located is only to give the government enough time to take measures to stop any future use of the plane for terroristic purposes.....


196 posted on 03/23/2014 9:33:50 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

The data was shut off, all that was transmitted was the periodic handshake.


197 posted on 03/23/2014 9:44:24 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

It depends on the detection limits of the listening device and if there is such a device in the Indian Ocean. I’m sure that information is classified.


198 posted on 03/23/2014 9:44:26 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: fso301

48 feet of road bed width is what is needed.


199 posted on 03/23/2014 9:45:57 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: txgirl4Bush

CNN: Crew of Chinese plane searching for MH370 has spotted “suspicious objects” in south Indian Ocean, China’s state-run media reports.


200 posted on 03/23/2014 9:48:09 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson