Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Simple. If a customer asks about any allergen, the answer is “yes, everything on the menu is cooked in or exposed to peanut oil and may cause a reaction”, “yes, everything on the menu contains or is exposed to wheat and may cause a reaction”, and “yes, everything on the menu has been exposed to shellfish and may cause a reaction”. I would not want the risk of a customer with allergies who wants to use this law. Thinking back to the moron who sued McD’s because their fries had been exposed to beef (no kidding - everything in the restaurant is coated with a layer of oil from cooking fries and a layer of oil from the burgers).


72 posted on 03/23/2014 4:01:09 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

That is exactly what I would do. Unfortunately, the nanny staters would probably make it an ADA requirement that I have to serve them something they can eat.


77 posted on 03/23/2014 5:38:24 AM PDT by Codeflier (Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson