Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always A Marine
I had heard about that IL68 flight. I wasn't sure that MH370 would have been able to catch up with IL68 because of their departure times (which I think were, like, 20 min apart) and they went in opposite directions. One went NE and the other NW. You say MH370 would have caught up? I'm not stuck on one theory. I think one theory is as good as the other considering the information we have right now.

It reminds me of Payne Stewart because communications between the pilot and ground seemed normal. Then the plane took a right turn and there was no response from the plane after that. But then, how did the transponders get turned off on MH370? That had to be deliberate or a system failure of some kind. We're just not going to know until we know, and we may never know...

97 posted on 03/21/2014 11:39:13 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: virgil

Tho thoughts on that, one from personal experience.

First, commercial aircraft don’t fly at maximum speed but at a lower “cruising” speed in order to both save fuel and leave some ability to speed up if bucking headwinds so they can still arrive on schedule.

In my own experience which doesn’t completely apply in this case on a return flight from New York to Chicago our pilot diverted (with permission I suppose) from his regular flight plan and flew well north of his original flight plan to catch an unusual effect of the jet stream which allowed us to arrive in Chicago almost a half hour earlier than originally scheduled.

How do I know that? The pilot announced to the passengers what he was doing and why before he did it.


98 posted on 03/21/2014 11:57:17 PM PDT by dglang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson