Replies

"Maybe she requested a copy of an SS-5 for a deceased person.... I suppose it comes down to who you want to believe Orly taitz or Susan Daniels."

By law, the SSA Is suppose to fulfill the Bounel's SS-5 FOIA request in about 20 days and not stall for 5 months. Taitz and Mr Brewer did send in their FOIA to the SSA alright and not some other requested form submission. No doubt about it.

Lets again look at the OBot premise going around the Web that since Taitz sent her FOIA request to the wrong office, it is the reason why for the big delay. No hanky-panky by the Obama Administration - this is completely and utterly laughable.

I'll even grant you the silly argument that Taitz sent the FOIA to the "wrong office" because it does not matter where she sent her FOIA as long as it entered the system. There is no really "wrong office" where to send FOIAs to the SSA.

If you would have read post #103 you would have seen it right from the horses mouths or the Social Security Administration. Here it is again. Check out the bold words:

"How We Process Requests

We receive FOIA requests via the internet, or by fax, email, and U.S. mail.

Regardless of the submission method, we capture all FOIA requests in our electronic Freedom of Information Act (eFOIA) system. We scan and image all paper requests (mail, email, and fax) into eFOIA, whereas requests submitted through our internet request form go directly into eFOIA. As soon as we enter a request into the system, or a person submits an online request, eFOIA generates an acknowledgement letter. While this letter confirms for the requester our receipt of their request, it also provides a reference number specifically assigned to their case, along with a voice mailbox telephone number, the requester can call to inquire on the status of his or her request. OPD maintains a policy of responding to all calls placed to this number within one working day. "

As you can plainly see OBots, the SSA takes FOIA requests from all types of media and from any office because it will all go into a centralized computer data system called the "electronic Freedom of Information Act (eFOIA) system" whether the FOIAs come from mail, email, fax, boats, bus, trains, trucks or rocket ships.

There's more OBot. You fail to heed or read what Seizethecarp posted at post #104 as it says from the Washington Examiner's article,

"“Most transparent’ White House ever rewrote the FOIA to suppress politically sensitive docs” [ Hahaha]

"By Mark Tapscott, Washington Examiner

It's Sunshine Week, so perhaps some enterprising White House reporter will ask press secretary Jay Carney why President Obama rewrote the Freedom of Information Act without telling the rest of America.

The rewrite came in an April 15, 2009, memo from then-White House Counsel Greg Craig instructing the executive branch to let White House officials review any documents sought by FOIA requestors that involved "White House equities."

That phrase is nowhere to be found in the FOIA, yet the Obama White House effectively amended the law to create a new exception to justify keeping public documents locked away from the public. ..."
-end snip-

So what really happened here based on the damning info. we have is that Taitz sent in a very simple FOIA request that should have been completed in 20 days or less, but butt this wasn't sooooo simple because it came from Orly Taitz! OBOt red flags go off at the SSA. Oh Gack! The OPD at the Social Security Administration who runs their FOIA program put a stop to Taitz request, and asks for guidance from the Obama White House. You do remember the White House April 15th, 2009 memo here and at post #104 right OBot? Just checking. Val Jal " the Dragon Lady" Jarrett who is likely the one on top of these "bad Birther ops" gets the call from the ODP acting Director Daniel Callahan asking what do we do? Well of course the Obama Dragon Lady no doubt said, you don't give Taitz anything -zilch.

However, since this is in the Fed. District Court that has recently ruled in favor for Taitz because the judge likely has detected not so honest answers from this OBot Admin.

The pressure from the court has made the OPD and Jarrett to act or at least fake it where there was once an indefinite stop to Taitz's FOIA request. Here's Taitz on her website speaking to an BS'ing OBot.

- - - - - - - - - -

"dr_taitz@yahoo.com March 21st, 2014 @ 6:24 pm

no, he did not. He requested under 120 year rule. also, the FOIA was sent in October of 2013, they were supposed to respond within 20 working days and they did not respond for 5 months. Now they are saying to go to another office. They suddenly responded after I sent Brewer’s letter to Judge Hollander. PS a letter from Wiggins preceded this letter and Wiggins released records of other people, so obviously he sent to the right office "

- - - - - -

Taitz is highly and very likely correct that Judge Hollander pressure made the OPD/SSA to act but likely only in a fake appearance. So Dawn Wiggins, the Deputy Director for OPD, sends Taitz the letter that her FOIA is now being processed for a search at the OEO.

Butt don't worry your hard hearts OBots, some dishonest, appointed Obama official likely saw to it long ago to "cauterize" the Bounel SS-5 record from all the others, and hid it to stay "lost" for next 500 years in some dusty closet. Unless some hidden patriot comes forward, or a SSA worker has the case of the honest conscious, or some OBot gets sceeerrred that at some future date will be charged with obstruction of justice.