Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Adder
A felony? for political speech?

I don't think it was for political speech. I think it was for resisting the officers who tried to remove him once he had gone over his allotted time.

It's kind of like this: if I'm pulled over for speeding and I point a gun in the officer's face, I'm not getting killed for speeding.

20 posted on 03/19/2014 5:00:41 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham
It's kind of like this: if I'm pulled over for speeding and I point a gun in the officer's face, I'm not getting killed for speeding.

You're right. I think they should have beat him to death, and shot his dog.

22 posted on 03/19/2014 5:15:51 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Watch the video.

He doesn’t appear to be violent.

I cannot believe he’s being charged with a felony. Wow.


29 posted on 03/19/2014 6:14:37 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ( http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Greetings Mr Ramsbotham...great name btw.

“I don’t think it was for political speech. I think it was for resisting the officers who tried to remove him once he had gone over his allotted time.”

Watch the video. The speaker might well be a reoccurring loudmouth at these meetings, but it was obviously a local inside plot to shut this guy up.....permanently. 3 officers and a sergeant just happened to be there? The chairs are nearly empty. The fat cop IMMEDIATELY starts bleating “Don’t resist!” BEFORE it was made clear they were arresting him.

Shadows of the infamous Waco armored assault that was “...not an assault.” or at least that is what the loudspeakers said as the tanks smashed the building down..., wait sorry...60 ton tracked recovery vehicles.

Back to Michigan.....

In the Declaration:
“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”

In the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting....the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

His petition was over his property rights.....using speech to defend what he thought were his rights.

1 tyrant 3,000 miles away is no worse than 3,000 tyrants 1 mile away.

Just saying. Peace brother.


34 posted on 03/19/2014 6:42:00 AM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson