Anybody wanting to have a Constitutional Convention is sick in the head. Can you imagine? The first cut would be right to arms. Second would be to change the right to speech, third would be to change the right to practice religion. The naive people who want this are not very smart.
Couldn't agree more. I ‘ve warned people over the years who advocated this route that rights would be taken out and new rights like “rights” to healthcare, late term abortions, housing, and clean environment would be added
Anybody that refers to Article-V as a "con-con" or "Constitutional Convention" either knows little to nothing about what Article-V or "COS" really means, or is purposely trying to thwart patriots trying to repair the gates so that the enemy from within can be expelled. Under THIS Constitution, there has ONLY ever been one con-con, and under THIS Constitution, that happened in 1789. Period.
Article-V circumvents the federals - they are largely out of the process - and is a states-rights mechanism to right the wrongs of "national" government.
“Anybody wanting to have a Constitutional Convention is sick in the head. Can you imagine? The first cut would be right to arms. Second would be to change the right to speech, third would be to change the right to practice religion. The naive people who want this are not very smart.”
By inference, you mean all those same people who wrote our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Bunch of dummies in your mind, which means BTW that you are the dummy.
That's not what he's talking about, pay attention.