Here’s the problem.
Elections are battles not wars. If you win the battle, you automatically EXPECT to get something for your effort.
But—
The young people of the then-Soviet Union won their battle in 1991 as they turned the tanks around and beat back the Gang of Eight and bolshevism with it.
But what did they get with the restoration of Russia? More repression, a police state, bloody elitist rule yet again.
In 2010, the Tea Party routed Demoviks and RINOs across the land. But what did we get? John Boehner—more insider, elitist rule and a government angling us further into a soft police state.
We can win all the “battles” in 2014 and lose anyway.
True enough Bob and many realize just that.Just one of the reasons our war on rinos is in full throttle right now when it can do some good.
I heard the gov. of Iowa I believe has some competition now from a freeper!
its here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3133755/posts
Tom Hoefling now running for gov. in Iowa—he’s a freeper!!
“Elections are battles not wars.” - Well put
Lincoln had to go through a number of Generals before the North won their war of aggression.
We do need to have principled limited g’ment, strong individuals with good communications skills as our leader running for elected office. In Texas, Dan Patrick running for the Lt. Governor’s spot is that person.
Voting for a RINOs is a vote for Socialism. In Texas the current sitting senator who is up for re-election, John Wayne McCornin, is that RINO leading the way to dictatorial socialism