[Lou Budvis]

I find it curious that people who want a limited gov’t think there ought to be laws regulating sexual acts between consenting adults.

[SoConPubbie]

I find it curious that people who want a limited gov’t think there ought to be laws regulating sexual acts between consenting adults.

And yet there have always, until lately, been such laws, at least, at the state level against such actions.

And I dare say, that the founders, if they had even an inkling of it occurring in future generations, would have included provisions/amendments to the constitution defining Marriage as between a man and a woman. Gay marriage wasn't even close to being on their "radar" and the thought of two perverts/deviants being allowed to marry each other would have been inconceivable to them.

They were Christian gentlemen who declared that this form of government they gave to their future generations was only meant for a Christian nation.

[NewCenturions]

It isn’t about regulating their queer acts. But you can’t re-define depravity as a “marriage”.