Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
Huh? It would have been a blood bath for America, we had many 100s of thousands of GI's there and were probably going to lose at least 25% of our troops sent to reinforce from the US, before they ever reached the battlefield as their transport planes were shot down, and ships sank.

It certainly would be unpleasant, but we warred in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia and a few minor places against the Communists without those kind of losses or attacks on the continental US. Using foreign lands for battlefields has worked out quite well, not that I like it, but at the time Reagan did the right thing, and prepared in the best way known at the time to prevent overt Communist aggression.

It was the subversive campaign we lost, although Reagan tried very hard to fight it.

113 posted on 03/16/2014 11:57:17 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Navy Patriot

You have no grasp of the scale of war that was expected to engulf Europe, America, and the world, if the Soviets attacked.

America was not expected to survive, Western Europe sure wouldn’t have.


116 posted on 03/16/2014 12:44:50 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson