>Pity most of the other justices don’t feel that way.
Neither does Justice Scalia or he would be opining and voting to completely overturn Wickard v Filburn (1942) instead of just nibbling at it here and there.
But that would revive pre-Prohibition jurisprudence on the interstate commerce clause and make the federal War on Drugs as unconstitutional and futile as the War on Alcohol was before the 18th Amendment.
Scalia would never do that and besides, he’d be outvoted by the liberals and other so-called conservatives on the Court 7-2 (with Justice Thomas).
But that would revive pre-Prohibition jurisprudence on the interstate commerce clause
There are a lot of Scalia and Thomas dissents referencing the absurd wrongheadedness of the current understanding of the commerce clause.