I'm not a "social liberal" and you know it. At least be honest.
for instance the feds have to have federal laws regarding gays, and gay marriage, and abortion, we don’t want libertarians who support leftist views on those issues being elected.
The feds UNCONSTITUTIONALLY make those laws. Apparently you acquiesce to such federal governmental power. I do not. My fight is to give those things back to the states where they belong. If you think that the fight is just to get the right politicians in there so the government can do the wrong thing the right way, then you are delaying the inevitable.
I'm sure you'll construe what I'm saying to mean "I'm against conservatives" but that is also a dishonest statement. My ideal candidate is a Reagan or a Palin who knows the greatest threat we have is big government, but who also hold to traditional Christian values. The mistake is to unconstitutionally put these things into the hands of the federal government where they don't belong and where sooner or later they will be twisted and perverted as we see now.
Please tell me where our federal government who have unconstitutionally commandeered laws regarding traditional American values has advanced such values in the last 50-100 years?
If you are libertarian and arguing against social conservatives and conservatism, then it is pretty obvious who you support.
The feds have to make laws regarding the military, federal employment and immigration, and always have, how did you miss that, and why call it “unconstitutional” since the first congresses were doing it, and had to do it?
Which state decides federal law on abortion on federal land and hospitals and gay military service and recognizing gay marriage in the military and federal employment and immigration?