I think the anger is justified. My remark is that I doubt the senitment against him rises to the level of being a credible threat. So far, he is just a bigmoth, and generally speaking, that is not enough to justify use of force against him.
At the same time, I fully expect some people have expressed there, just like here, that if the cop comes banging on their door to enforce this particular law, that they will use deadly force in resistance.
Anonymous remarks that are direct, unconditional threats? I expect those are made by gun grabbers, some of which are supposed to be public servants, and some of which may be fellow police officers.
http://www.19actionnews.com/story/24785451/cop-accused-of-deadly-crash-cover-up-to-be-rehired
Cops in Connecticut are treated with velvet gloves. A very recent case in point...
A terse summary of the events...
Rookie cop in Windsor Locks, CT is tailgate partying; he drives drunk; on the way hits and Kills a 15 y/o kid riding his bike home.
First person the scene, is rookie’s father, veteran cop Sgt. Robert Koistinen; dad takes son from scene w/out breathalyzer; subsequent breathalyzers refused; drives around town with son in car; can’t find the bottle eyewitness says rookie threw on her lawn after the accident; son is serving a five-year prison sentence.
Dad announces thus week, wants his job and *lost* wages back; instead of being drummed out of town, he wants his job back! That translates to *I want to grow my pension B4 I retire*.
Time after time, rogue cops are not held accountable for their actions. Connecticut is no exception.
These are the people Salvavida wants to *make nice* with....the same ones who can’t wait to kick down your door.
Thumb up.