Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chopperman
The Constitution didn't define 'marriage' either.

The Constitution doesn't use the term "marriage" at all.

The issue raised in the post to which I replied is which rule of interpretation should be used as to specific Constitutional language. Why you think some other term not found in the Constitution is relevant in this context escapes me.

48 posted on 03/14/2014 8:13:22 AM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: CpnHook
In both cases, people today are trying to redefine what was known to be facts in their time.

I am sure that our Founding Fathers are turning in their graves due to the corruption of our values.

50 posted on 03/14/2014 8:35:05 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson