Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cyber Liberty

This true, but short of us developing an intelligence on the order of the fictional SkyNet, I don’t see a workaround for having to trust human beings in the cockpit.

I don’t mean to say that we don’t have rudimentary AI that could probably completely handle a plane in just about any condition, but the truth is, we are going to have human pilots for the foreseeable future, until the machine pilots can B.S. with passengers & flirt with flight attendants.

Humans like humans being in control, because we can understand and interact with them, even if the humans may be more fallible or less trustworthy! I think this boils down, at its base, to the fact that most believe the human pilot wants to live as badly as they do, and they don’t understand programming concepts or how the machine does or doesn’t perceive the human condition.


75 posted on 03/13/2014 3:58:46 PM PDT by Aqua225 (Realist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Aqua225
Yeah, I prefer a human too.

I guess crazy people are more or less screened out, but bad pilots happen (Egyptian Airlines). Not sure anything can be done to loony-proof the craft.

This: I think this boils down, at its base, to the fact that most believe the human pilot wants to live as badly as they do...

That went out the window with the Egyptian Airlines crash a few years back caused by a Jihadi. That trust is broken, and a lot of people won't fly again until Islam is stricken from the planet.

78 posted on 03/13/2014 4:13:58 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson