Dershowitz may be a liberal, but he does not care for underhanded operations and political retributiomn from either side.
The Department of “Just-Us” has become both highly polarized and highly politicized. Not much can be done about the situation until somehow, the Current Regime now squatting in the White Hut is evicted.
Slowly or quickly, depends upon how many pick up pitchforks and torches, and march on the edifice at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
I think when Ted Cruz is president, he should appoint D’Souza as attorney general. I know, he’s not an attorney. But wouldn’t that be justice?
I understand the idea of “selective prosecution”, but if D’Souza used straw donors, then there’s not much to complain about.
Slightly. </sarcasm>The law(s) he is accused of breaking are “Campaign Finance Reform” laws. Those laws are, and should be held to be, unconstitutional. And if D’Souza makes that claim, Obama might prefer to back down rather than give SCOTUS - which now includes Alito, Roberts, and three justices - Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy - who dissented from the McConnell v. FEC ruling which upheld McCain-Feingold.“Campaign Finance Reform” legislation presumes to restrict the donation of money to to be used to buy political advertising. It does not presume to touch the rights of newspapers to publish their political opinions, nor to spend their money - in unlimited amounts - doing so. But it does presume to restrict your option to spend your money to promote your opinions. Notwithstanding that the newspaper cannot - under the First Amendment - be licensed by the government. They have no qualifications whatsoever, yet CFR presumes to deny to you - and, particularly in this case, Dinesh D’Souza - a right which it doesn’t claim to have the right to touch for those who happen already to have a newspaper. A newspaper and, if truth be told, membership in the Associated Press.