[PeteB570]

The problem is the “all or nothing” form of today’s politics.

The idea of not voting for someone because of one stance on one issue is a little short sited.

So the libertarian Republican voted for Obama because of Mitt’s social views?

What good is it to have a made up family when the D’s have trashed the economy so bad that you can’t feed them?

[lavaroise]

Indeed... if there was one issue of rally it would be gun control.

It seems even there the single issue voters have their heads up their heinies.

No, what this is is propaganda and embrace of it. Purges will follow once their firmly stupidly adopted language will be discarded for other uses.

Indeed, before God acts, there will be many changes in languages... and those whose body is stuck with it will be truly obsolete and discarded. These people are robot and only repeat the feel good crap they were fed.

[cripplecreek]

The idea of not voting for someone because of one stance on one issue is a little short sited.

Of course it is but some issues are of more importance to others. On the other hand both conservatives and libertarians need to be able to compromise on lesser issues. For instance drug legalization. I'm not a fan of drug legalization but I would be OK with decriminalization primarily because it wouldn't grow government.

Another issue is the great many who are hard left liberals who are simply and knowingly lying. They go to GOP events and pimp their liberalism and run right out and vote straight democrat ticket. I've got a militant far left lesbian cousin who calls herself GOPproud and hates conservatives.

[Drew68]

So the libertarian Republican voted for Obama because of Mitt’s social views?

No.

SoCons stayed home.