Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
"“”You keep slipping around the marriage issue, again, federal law HAS to address marriage at the federal level, for instance for military personnel."

You make that assertion as if it's absolute fact because you said so. That's like saying government must continue to fund Social Security indefinitely. Or that the USA can never default on its' debt.

165 posted on 03/11/2014 2:52:30 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

It is absolute fact, the military could not operate by suddenly deciding that in it’s eyes, everyone is single and always will be.

The feds have to decide if a person trying to immigrate is married or not.

Do you really think the founders didn’t know the constitution, or the realities of life when they were writing marriage law at the federal level in 1780, 1784, 1798, 1802?


167 posted on 03/11/2014 3:29:21 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Anything to avoid answering the simple question to reveal how far your pro-gay agenda goes.

With hetro marriage in the military being fully recognized, do you support the military not recognizing gay marriage while they do recognize normal marriage?


169 posted on 03/11/2014 4:59:08 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson