It was two and they were open, but one was sure light in the loafers and fairly obvious to anyone with gaydar.
It was later confirmed at a ship reunion in Las Vegas when he was fairly open about it.
The other was a woman who, anyone could tell, was trying to be a man.
I don't buy your contention that federal law has to address marriage. If the military doesn't address marriage at all, the members could sign a form indicating where they want their insurance to go to, and could also claim a dependent for housing etc.
So no, I am opposed to Federal sanction or interference in marriage in all cases.
Again, did you cast a vote in the POTUS Primaries or General election? If you did, you cast a vote for a supporter of DADT.
Right?
You kind of stretched that it seems, in your push for the gay agenda.
You also keep refusing to answer about equal recognition for gay service members marriages.
You want to hide behind something impossible politically, and militarily, and that has never existed in America, for the military to ignore and not acknowledge the families of the military personnel.
Every GI treated as single, every base built for the single, every retired military treated as single, every death treated as the death of a single>
You are searching the world of bizarre fantasy for such a fantastical change in America and the American military, as a way to avoid revealing how liberal you really are, it is a silly evasion.