Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bitcoin Debacle Shatters the Myth of Virtual Money
Townhall ^ | 03/05/2014 | Peter Morici

Posted on 03/09/2014 11:21:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Bitcoin believers were shaken to their digital souls when Mt. Gox, the world’s largest exchange, defaulted on $470 million worth of deposits and closed.

The virtual currency was supposed to provide a safer, more private and less costly alternative to money issued by governments, but lacking the imprimatur of a sovereign is failing.

Fundamentally, money provides a secure place to keep your wealth—you can store your savings for later use at a government guaranteed bank. And it eliminates the inconvenience of barter—a necessity for even the most rudimentary market economy.

Money permits a nightclub singer to buy bread from a baker who gets his music from iTunes. All accept dollars, because the U.S. government declares those to be “legal tender for all debts public and private.”

You can do business through barter or some alternative currency. However, workers, suppliers and landlords expect to be paid in dollars, and the IRS will require dollars at tax time for income earned through barter.

What gives money its value are the goods and services that may be purchased and taxes paid within the sovereign jurisdiction of the issuing government.

The earliest currencies were coins, often with the face of the sovereign stamped on gold or silver to instill confidence. Yet, governments minted coins with non-precious metals, and the Chinese issued paper money more than two thousand years ago.

The creators of Bitcoin and advocates of virtual currencies are fixated by the temptation of governments to print too much and destroy its value through inflation. However, inflation is hardly a problem in the United States, Europe and Japan, and central banks in other countries hold dollars, euro and yen to back up their currencies.

Bitcoin is created by ordinary folks solving increasingly difficult mathematical problems defined by the virtual currency’s creator, and like gold, is naturally limited in supply. It is stored in virtual wallets on private computers, or deposited at exchanges like Mt. Gox. These function much like commercial banks but are not guaranteed for safety by the FDIC, Federal Reserve and similar regulatory agencies around the world.

There is no “Bitland” where a government has declared it legal tender to buy goods and services and pay taxes. Lacking such a tangible connection to the real economy, it is very hard to value day-to-day, never mind next year.

Bitcoin traded for $1,117 on December 4, and now commands only about half that amount.

It is no place for your children’s college fund or retirement savings.

Bitcoin is hardly secure. A hacker can steal it from your digital wallet or an exchange that holds your deposits, just as pirates stole bank debit and credit card numbers from Target. And the government does not stand ready to back up Bitcoin exchanges that lose your money or identity to thieves.

A 2013 study found some 45 percent of all Bitcoin exchanges closed, taking their depositors money with them.

Bitcoin is supposed to be more private, because unlike commercial banks, its exchanges are not monitored by regulators, and its private payments system charges lower fees than do Visa and MasterCard.

However, personal and business transactions can be spied by hackers or government security agencies through its fairly open payments system. The government can subpoena your Bitcoin records or those of your exchange when it needs.

Factoring in such risks and potential intrusions, Bitcoin is a lot less private and more expensive to use than advertised.

Detractors of paper money have always been fixated by the absence of gold to back it up, but they fail to recognize what really makes a currency accepted and secure—the government guarantee and the good sense of the sovereign not to abuse its franchise.

It’s not the gold but the face of Caesar—the promise his image carries—that makes a coin money.

-- Peter Morici is an economist and professor at the Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, and a widely published columnist.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bitcoin; currency; virtualmoney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: SeeSharp

Perhaps you can demonstrate an example of a “defined” exchange rate other than market-defined.


61 posted on 03/10/2014 6:09:32 PM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Perhaps you can demonstrate an example of a “defined” exchange rate other than market-defined.

A defined exchange rate is one that is fixed by law. One example would be the Bretton Woods Accord which set the exchange rates for all participating currencies in terms of dollars, then set a fixed exchange rate for dollars in terms of gold (albeit redeemable only by central banks).

62 posted on 03/10/2014 7:14:42 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

So you are saying you can’t give a current example of a “defined” (by your definition) exchange rate. But for some reason I am supposed to provide one to you for a virtual currency. Do you see the double standard?


63 posted on 03/11/2014 5:18:02 AM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: palmer
So you are saying you can’t give a current example of a “defined” (by your definition) exchange rate.

Where did I say that?

You asked for an example and I gave you one. Go to Cuba, exchange your dollars for pesos, and you will get to see a currently defined exchange rate. The definition of "defined exchange rate" doesn't change over time.

But for some reason I am supposed to provide one to you for a virtual currency. Do you see the double standard?

Who is being intentionally obtuse now? Provide an old example of a define exchange rate for Bitcoin if you have one.

64 posted on 03/11/2014 8:52:07 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind


Whoooo-hoooooo, modern day "mining".


65 posted on 03/11/2014 9:01:36 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
I said many posts ago that only examples of your definition of "defined" are done by thugs, and sure enough, you suggest Cuba.

Since you seem to need everything spelled out: gold is denominated in bitcoin (contrary to your assertion) just as gold is denominated in dollars. The price is set by the market and fluctuates. There were times before 1933 when there was a de facto defined (your definition) rate for gold and 1968 for silver, but there has not been any since.

Since that is how all currencies currently work, except for a few thug currencies, then that makes bitcoin equal to gold or any other store of value since the value is defined in the same way as gold.

66 posted on 03/11/2014 9:32:33 AM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How many banks have failed? Did the USD go away?

No?

How about that...


67 posted on 03/11/2014 9:37:06 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Tre Norner eg ber, binde til rota...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

LOL. So, unable to back up your assertions with even a single example, you now resort to redefining words. Denominated means defined in terms of. Bitcoin is not defined in terms of anything.


68 posted on 03/11/2014 9:52:19 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

I’m not the one reaching into the trashbin for Cuba or Bretton Woods. Enjoy your gold because I know I like having mine. As for bitcoin it looks like you will be left behind.


69 posted on 03/11/2014 11:15:16 AM PDT by palmer (There's someone in my lead but it's not me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Omg


70 posted on 03/11/2014 1:23:42 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Agree on all points.


71 posted on 03/11/2014 1:24:50 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson