Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76
Reasonable people expect livestock to be treated humanely and most farmers would agree.

If most farmers agree, and don't do this, then why is it that you ignore the Constitutional issue and rant on about chicken comforts? Why should the entire nation be subject to one state's laws when they are based on a notion that you already assert is mostly untrue? If most farmers don't do this, then why must 300 million people face higher prices to address an issue that only concerns a few farms and have it dictated by only one state?

269 posted on 04/04/2014 5:53:16 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317
How does the Constitution enter into this argument?

I willingly pay higher prices for fresh eggs from local farms. Don't need any laws in place for that - it's a consumer choice. If others want to eat cheap eggs from chickens that are cooped up in cages all their lives, that's up to them.

270 posted on 04/04/2014 8:06:49 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson