Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacob Kell

These memorials ar all over the public roads around here. They are taken down after a while by the hwy department because they are eyesores and I personally find them in disgustingly poor taste. Cross/star of David / whatever. I find them in questionable taste as I do the etched glass or decal memorials on the rear windows of cars.

Memorials should be in your heart, not the mean streets nor the back windows of cars that will rust and be crushed

If the memorial was on their property I wish them well. If it was just on the side of a public road, I say no.


30 posted on 03/08/2014 9:55:10 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vaquero

Sorry, but the First Amendment trumps what you believe to be in “disgustingly poor taste.”

These memorials are not on private property against the will of the land owner, but are on public land.

Sometimes they may be at the corner of an intersection or on the side or the road or just off the sidewalk near a home or hospital where someone died or even sometimes near an abortion mill where thousands have been murdered.

Again, it is a First Amendment Right.


41 posted on 03/08/2014 10:09:02 AM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero

“These memorials ar all over the public roads around here. They are taken down after a while by the hwy department because they are eyesores and I personally find them in disgustingly poor taste. Cross/star of David / whatever. I find them in questionable taste as I do the etched glass or decal memorials on the rear windows of cars.

Memorials should be in your heart, not the mean streets nor the back windows of cars that will rust and be crushed

If the memorial was on their property I wish them well. If it was just on the side of a public road, I say no.”

Your opinion only. Doesn’t mean that everyone else agrees, nor should they have to obey your wishes or anyone
elses. These are public roads and right-of-ways, and belong to all taxpayers.


77 posted on 03/08/2014 11:29:02 AM PST by LaRueLaDue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero

Maybe it’s just you and me, but free exercise of religion does not entitle one to post memorials on public property. That’s because the posting essentially excludes other uses (including an unobstructed and undistracted view).

Having a tragedy on public property does not confer ownership.

The memorials are no more justified that a “I lost 20 pounds” sign.

But, hey, I’m a conservative, and I realize that conservative principles apply even when it goes contrary to my emotions and personal preference.


82 posted on 03/08/2014 12:46:25 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson