What part of a man’s brain would agree that this is sound judgment?
So it would be okay if I took photos of your wife’s panties by using a camera I deliberately placed on my foot aimed up at her concealed private parts for self-pleasuring later? Right, judge?
The guy must be a liberal sexual deviant on the side. A lot of judges are.
This means I can’t wear a skirt anymore but more especially neither can my elementary aged daughters.
Modest women will all be wearing shalwar khameez (dresses with pants underneath).
Only women who want to have their privates photograhed will wear skirts.
The judge agreed with the Prosecutor, and stated "...that while the prosecution’s “proposition is eminently reasonable,” the current writing of the law that Robertson was charged under does not cover that particular circumstance."
The law, as written, has 5 criteria:
That the defendant willfully photographed, videotaped, or electronically surveilled; the subject was another person who was nude or partially nude; the defendant did so with the intent to secretly conduct or hide his photographing activity; the defendant conducted such activity when the other person was in a place and circumstance where the person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy in not being “so photographed”; and the defendant did so without the other person’s knowledge or consent.
The judge is correct in this matter, and a different ruling would be judicial activism, which we all protest, methinks. They are currently advocating rewriting the law, or adding another to cover these circumstances.
We’re slip sliding away.