Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce
If Cornyn had been held to less than 50%, there would have been a run-off. 10 points.

/johnny

8 posted on 03/05/2014 5:47:00 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper

You are correct. It’s too early in the morning—I erred in my math.


9 posted on 03/05/2014 5:47:56 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

He only won the primary by 9%

4.5% change to another would have swung it

Does anyone here have VOTE TALLY? (actual numbers)


38 posted on 03/05/2014 6:28:58 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

Y’all are being too hard on Cornyn. He is the second most conservative member of the Senate. He told me so!


44 posted on 03/05/2014 6:43:51 AM PST by Jraider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

“If Cornyn had been held to less than 50%, there would have been a run-off. 10 points.”

No, it is 18 points of additional turnout.

Now if you could get a cornyn voter to flip and vote for someone else, then it is 10 points.

But if all the cornyn voters voted for cornyn then you would need 18 points of additional turnout to force a run off.


51 posted on 03/05/2014 6:59:03 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson