While I’m convinced that gay fascism is one of our generation’s greatest threats to freedom, I’m not sure this veto was bad. Having a law that codifies the First Amendment is a bad thing if that law is a lightning rod for court challenges and leads to further encroachments from a lawless Supreme Court. Simply leaving the silly question to natural law and human ingenuity may be the best option until the far left fringe loses their obsession with homosexuality. We have the power today to refuse service - we need only be creative.
A baker/photographer/artist cannot refuse service and give an honest reason, which is a shame, but decent people who refuse to endorse perversion by participating can still refuse service. They need only write the contract carefully to specify no penalty for non-performace if given a 24 hour notice and then gracefully and regretfully apologize at the last minute due to an unspecified but unanticipated problem.
“until the far left fringe loses their obsession with homosexuality. “
The left is only for and about identity politics. Since this is a recognizable identity they will never lose their obsession. It’s not an obsession. It’s politics. As long as they can use gayness as a rallying point they will.