To: Pollster1
This is ridiculous. This is involuntary servitude. A business should be able to refuse to provide a good or service based on any grounds. There are plenty of other businesses who will fill the void.
154 posted on
02/26/2014 7:21:26 PM PST by
Girlene
(Hey, NSA!)
To: Girlene
A business should be able to refuse to provide a good or service based on any grounds. Yes, that's how it should be.
So this now means a black baker must make a cake for the Klan???
160 posted on
02/26/2014 7:31:23 PM PST by
broken_clock
(Do it Sarah! Cut the ties that bind.)
To: Girlene
A business should be able to refuse to provide a good or service based on any grounds. There are plenty of other businesses who will fill the void.
Yes. Maybe Gov. Brewer was correct for vetoing THIS particular bill, it may have been poorly written. Hopefully, the Ariz. legislature will soon go back to the drawing board. However, what if a Black-owned bakery refused service to some White supremacists? Or if a Jewish-owned Kosher caterer refused to accommodated a neo-Nazi group? Letr's get real, for every baker, caterer, photographer, limo driver, priest, minister, rabbi, etc. who refuses to get involved in servicing gay weddings there are many others willing to fill that niche.
201 posted on
02/26/2014 11:01:27 PM PST by
Impala64ssa
(You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
To: Girlene
This is ridiculous. This is involuntary servitude. And this is evil. I hope to see systematic civil disobedience, noncompliance, and jury nullification.
208 posted on
02/27/2014 2:10:48 AM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson