[MNnice]

This is why I didn’t have a knee-jerk reaction to reducing the size of the military. We have too many people in the service who have no business being there. They’re there for all the wrong reasons and don’t contribute a whit to national defense.

[henkster]

What makes you think this regime would part ways with such a valuable soldier as Pfc. Sheffey? Seems to me she is exactly what they want.

[DestroyLiberalism]

MNnice wrote:
<<
This is why I didn’t have a knee-jerk reaction to reducing the size of the military. We have too many people in the service who have no business being there. They’re there for all the wrong reasons and don’t contribute a whit to national defense.
>>

************************************************************

What makes you think this anti-American, anti-military, Marxist regime would be interested in weeding out the bad apples in our armed forces?

[MNDude]

Reducing the size of the military doesn’t bother me any more either.

What are we afraid of? That communists from Russia is going to send over tanks and put a Marxist in the White House?

Or are we afraid that Islamists are going to come over here and put a strong Islam supporter in the White House that will attack Christian causes?

Or maybe the concern is the instability our enemies cause in the Middle East will cause gas to go up to higher than $3 a gallon and stay there.

[Max_850]

“This is why I didn’t have a knee-jerk reaction to reducing the size of the military. We have too many people in the service who have no business being there. They’re there for all the wrong reasons and don’t contribute a whit to national defense.”

But it won't be people like her or the new LBGT military that get downsized. They are the new privileged class in the Transformed United States. I have gone through downsizing under Clinton, so I know cuts can be targeted to certain career paths, grades, and other demographics...