Actually, his batting average was closer to .100 than .900.
Again, had he been more careful with his research, he would have accomplished much more.
Instead, he made leftists look like victims.
McCarthy was the kind of guy who cut corners.
We'll have to agree to disagree, wideawake. It's looking better than .900.
LIBERALS SECRET WEAPON: CONSERVATIVES WHO DONT READ
The Senate committee that was determined to censure McCarthy ended up having to drop the matter of McCarthys Wheeling speech entirely. A fact-filled memo detailing the committees findings concluded that McCarthy had said he had the names of 57 security risks, not 205.The truth about McCarthys Wheeling speech, including the committees memo finding that McCarthy was telling the truth, and a newspaper article reprinting the speech before it became a object of obsession by Democrats, is given in M. Stanton Evans monumental book, Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against Americas Enemies.
Moreover, contrary to the nonsense about McCarthy not being able to name the 57 specific individuals, the very day he got back to Washington, he gave a six-hour speech on the Senate floor, providing details about the problematic State Department employees, chapter and verse. He did not name names because that was not his point.
As McCarthy said, some State Department employees with communist associations might be innocent. His point was: The Democrats were still refusing to take Soviet espionage seriously by investigating these preposterous risks on the government payroll.
Far from recklessly smearing people, McCarthy described each employee as a case and cited such evidence as their being identified as Soviet spies in FBI reports, by fellow spies and by the State Department itself. He reported their connections to known agents, attendance at Youth International meetings in Russia and repeated contacts with known Soviet espionage groups.
These were not baseless charges. And as we now know, they were absolutely true.