Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
IRC, Ann Coulter said something that about 90 % or more of those accused by McCarthy were traitors, verified by the Venona intercepts and defectors, etc. He was good, but not that good. The rats exploited the errors that he couldn't prove, to great effect when you consider a 90 % batting average!

Actually, his batting average was closer to .100 than .900.

Again, had he been more careful with his research, he would have accomplished much more.

Instead, he made leftists look like victims.

McCarthy was the kind of guy who cut corners.

13 posted on 02/25/2014 1:57:15 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake; Tailgunner Joe
Actually, his batting average was closer to .100 than .900.

We'll have to agree to disagree, wideawake. It's looking better than .900.

LIBERALS’ SECRET WEAPON: CONSERVATIVES WHO DON’T READ

The Senate committee that was determined to censure McCarthy ended up having to drop the matter of McCarthy’s Wheeling speech entirely. A fact-filled memo detailing the committee’s findings concluded that McCarthy had said he had the names of 57 security risks, not 205.

The truth about McCarthy’s Wheeling speech, including the committee’s memo finding that McCarthy was telling the truth, and a newspaper article reprinting the speech before it became a object of obsession by Democrats, is given in M. Stanton Evans’ monumental book, “Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies.”

Moreover, contrary to the nonsense about McCarthy not being able to name the 57 specific individuals, the very day he got back to Washington, he gave a six-hour speech on the Senate floor, providing details about the problematic State Department employees, chapter and verse. He did not “name names” because that was not his point.

As McCarthy said, some State Department employees with communist associations might be innocent. His point was: The Democrats were still refusing to take Soviet espionage seriously by investigating these preposterous risks on the government payroll.

Far from recklessly smearing people, McCarthy described each employee as a “case” and cited such evidence as their being identified as Soviet spies in FBI reports, by fellow spies and by the State Department itself. He reported their connections to known agents, attendance at “Youth International” meetings in Russia and repeated contacts with known Soviet espionage groups.

These were not baseless charges. And as we now know, they were absolutely true.


23 posted on 02/25/2014 4:44:00 PM PST by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson