What else is new?
What pressure? The 2 percenters?
Becuase they're poorly written. Under the Arizona law as passed, any person can deny any services to anyone for any reason so long as they claim it violates their religious beliefs.
Since this is a “bill”, if Brewer signs it, the courts will overturn it.
Count on it. They always do.
No, the bill does not “allow them to refuse service to gays” it just does not “FORCE THEM to give service” to anyone they don’t want to serve.
If I don’t want your business how can the government FORCE me to give you service? (and would you really want what I give you if I am forced?)
When forced to give service to gays tell them you used HOLY WATER in the cake instead of regular water, in an attempt to ‘cure’ them...
I bet hilarity ensues!
(I love it when hilarity ensues)
She should sign it and say she’s doing it to appease Muslims who oppose homosexuality...there wouldn’t be a peep out of any politician!
And a number of corporations are calling for a veto too
I had to read till the end but I found this :
“ Arizona has no such law protecting people based on sexual orientation.”
And neither does the federal government. So it looks like a symbolic bill.
The very fact of the screeching vitriol by the homosexists is solid proof that this bill is desperately needed.
I have to laugh, because of all the singing of her praises on FR a couple years back. Photo shops were done with her as a tough Rosie the Riveter.
Remember this one? The only reason she stood tall was because she was pandering. I hate pandering, even if it's to us, because they always revert to form when you need them the most.
Fact. That State's own constitution (rightly) discriminates against homosexuals by refusing to recognize gay marriage, which is what the baker refused to do. The judge thus indicted the States constitution as violating the law, because a subsequent law added sexual orientation (south) to the an nondiscrimination law.
Fact: The baker offered to sell them other things but not a custom work of art specifically celebrating a moral abomination.
Fact: If a black baker, sign-maker or artist refused to make a custom sign celebrating a KKK convention,
or a Muslim for the birth of Israel, or refused to make hot dog rolls,
or if a liberal musician refused to make a song for Republicans,
or a homosexual hardware store owner refused to do business with the AFA,
then it is very unlikely the bakers/sign makers/artists/owners would be found guilty of violating discrimination laws, unless there was no one else to obtain services from.
And a liberal rock band threatened Romney with a lawsuit for playing one of their songs on ideological grounds, even though they had a license.
Suppose Jim Robinson sold bandwidth. Then he would be forced to sell to clearly liberal sites. Maybe the baker needs to "rent" the cakes with a license they must agree to.
Fact: The homosexual lobby has duped the willing into believing the same rights as belong to non moral aspects race and skin color are given also belongs to a behavior have.
Sorry. I think the Butt bangers will loose out in the long run.