Marriage is the legal protection provided to a biological relationship, in which a pair of people of opposite sex form a bond in order to produce children. The relationship is a biological imperative, evolved to guarantee the propagation of one’s genetic heritage.
No judge can change this biological reality.
Homosexuals simply cannot form pair-bonds. Most of them do not even have long-term relationships. They are suffering from a pathology, and the best we can do for them is attempt to find effective treatment—not pretend that they are normal by allowing them to meaninglessly sign the documents that legally protect pair-bonded couples.
God’s way or man’s way. I’ll go with the former.
I’d say this: I think one of these fascist judges are going to end up annoying the wrong well armed American at some point.
First thought: the winners write the history books, which is why this fight cannot be abandoned.
Second thought: like so many other cliches (’affordable health care’), this one has been taken up by the leftist masses because they love its self-righteous tone.
Wrong side of biology.
Progressives use “right side of history’ as their stamp of approval because they can’t use ‘right side of God.’
No government license was required to get married until “Miscegenation Laws” were enacted, requiring a license for mixed race marriages.
It shocks the conscience how we manage to ignore a “separation of church and state” doctrine, and somehow turned over a religious act (marriage) to the government, to regulate.
This unfortunate turn of events is also how we began down the slippery slope of losing our children to the State via Parens Patriae, by making government a contracted part of our families and have a multi-billion dollar family court industry with all of its ancillary parasites (therapists, counselors, evaluators, child support enforcement officers, child protective services agents and a host of others) all dependent upon the destruction of the family for their livelihoods.
“I will cite only Judge Vaughn Walker as an example”
A faggot judge living with his “partner” should have recused himself from the case. What a bunch of BS the US Supreme Court could have cared less if Walker was a fag. He was a judge and in their eyes he is GOD.
Walker's opinion is facially absurd. No state denies marriage licenses to gay men and lesbians.
What states deny are licenses for men to "marry" men, or women to "marry" women.
Those that worked so hard to present the idea that marriage is only between a man and a woman should appeal these rulings to the supreme court.
Or the court of appeals and then when the leftist unconstitutional ruling Judges support the other Judges’ unconstitutional rulings, then to the supreme court.
This also should have been done for all the states that voted for limiting gov benefits to citizens, not illegal insurgent invaders, also.
The constitution needs to be interoperated correctly, not “changed” to suit the leftists.
There is nothing in the constitution that condones homosexuals getting married.
“Beware of the compassionate” - Flannery O’Connor
Prager’s great on this subject, I don’t always get to listen to him but did yesterday. Smart man. Thumbs up DP.