[Ben Ficklin]

"I don't see how they can rule against the EPA"

The argument is that SCOTUS specifically mentioned auto tailpipes(a mobil source), but SCOTUS didn't mention stationary sources.

EPA says CO2 is CO2, whether it comes out of a tailpipe or power plant exhaust stack. And, SCOTUS didn't specifically exclude stationary sources in their 2007 decision.

[saganite]

I don’t see how they can differentiate between the two since they’ve already accepted that CO2 is a pollution source from whatever source but we shall see.