Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Purity or Strategy: The Debate We Need To Have: Would you rather put up with a RINO, or a Democrat?
Pajamas Media ^ | 02/22/2014 | Andrew Klavan

Posted on 02/23/2014 11:43:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind

YouTube Preview Image [1]

Last week, there was one of those mommy-and-daddy-are-fighting moments on Fox News as two powerhouse conservatives debated one of the most important issues facing the right. In one corner, was the dagger-sharp and stunningly beautiful and did I mention beautiful Ann Coulter. In the other corner, was the valiant, good-hearted and, you know, perfectly presentable in his own way Sean Hannity. No one can doubt either the patriotism or the fearlessness of these two. You may sometimes disagree with one or the other, that’s fine, but it seems undeniable that both have the good of the country first and foremost in their minds. Plus Ann’s really attractive.

You can watch the video to hear the whole thing but the gist is this. Ann thinks we have to stop “shysters” who pretend to represent the Tea Party from luring us into endless primaries against “establishment” Republicans. The thinking behind this (as I’ve heard her say elsewhere) is that there is only so much campaign money to go around and it needs to be focused wholly on defeating Democrats, winning a Republican majority in both houses and using that majority to “repeal Obamacare, repeal Obamacare, repeal Obamacare.”

Sean took a more purist Tea Party line, saying there are some Republicans who “should be defeated,” and endorsing the idea that we should primary the RINOs where we can and — my words here not his — we should end the civil war within the Republican Party by winning it for the true conservatives.

What a swell party this is!

Just to let you know where I stand emotionally, here’s a true story. The first time I made a speech before a Tea Party crowd, I felt as if I were floating two feet off the ground. I respected, admired and agreed with the Tea Partiers so completely, that my heart rose up and I began to believe that despite the Obama debacle, the country would ultimately be fine. As I was leaving the rally, I got a call from a friend asking me to come by for a drink with a couple of the highest-ranking Republicans in Washington. It was me and them, having a glass together, eye to eye. By the time I left that gathering, I was so depressed by the establishment GOP’s blindness and philosophical corruption I could barely see straight. I phoned Andrew Breitbart for moral support. “I’ve just had a drink with [blank] and [blank],” I began. And he responded immediately, “Are they ***holes or what?”

All my sympathies, in other words, are with the Tea Party. And I would truly love to see the RINOs skewered on their own horns.

And yet… In general, Tea Party candidates tend to do well in congressional races where small, homogenous districts are in play. In Senate races where you need votes across an entire state, a primary victory for someone like Christine O’Donnell or Todd Akin may briefly fill the conservative heart with joy, but the loss of a Senate seat that could have been won is simply too high a price to pay for that momentary triumph.

We need to talk this out with good sense and without pompous ranting. Politics is the art of the possible. Writing belligerently purist articles, blog posts or comments is relatively easy. Winning elections is hard. Barack Obama is one of the most destructive presidents this country has ever seen, but a talented politician. If stopping him in his tracks requires stomaching some RINOs here and there, it seems a no brainer: It must be done. Ann may have put her case a little too forcefully in the debate above (she’s not exactly given to dithering!), but surely she’s right in the general principle that strategy — and victory — have to come before purity.

I’d rather put up with frustrating RINOs than continue in the minority with our country under attack from within. But let me know what you think.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cinos; conservatives; linos; randsconcerntrolls; rino; tpinos; uniparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 last
To: Blackirish

“Win the Senate”????

Look, I’d like to be hopeful and do what I can in supporting only Conservatives to the cause - but can you provide any historical evidence that once a nation has been overthrown in a velvet or overt Marxist coup that ‘elections’ are ever “won” by those who are loyal to the government that was overthrown?

Obama could declare himself president for life, and we would still hear the parrots for the party lecture us about how we can ‘fix’ the dictatorship in the next election.

We have a fatal and possibly inoperable case of Normalcy Bias in this country.


181 posted on 02/24/2014 12:00:38 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Don’t know much about world/military history do you...


182 posted on 02/24/2014 12:34:13 PM PST by thejokker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

No they don’t but you go on dreaming.


183 posted on 02/24/2014 3:02:49 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: thejokker; itsahoot
How you feel is unimportant; defeating socialism is what matters. Nazi Germany was defeated because of our alliance with the Soviet Union. Getting in bed with the Russians was the lesser of two evils. It made victory possible.

This is a ridiculous comparison in the context of defeating MarxoFascism that has staged a velvet coup right in our faces.

First, the U.S. had a common enemy with the Soviets against Nazi Germany at the time.

It was an application of 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend'. That tactic only ever lasts until the common foe is defeated.

That tactic DOES NOT APPLY HERE in the context of supporting Establishment Ruling Class Republicans against Marxist Democrats.

Conservatives and the RINO/Ruling Class DO NOT HAVE A COMMON ENEMY in the Socialists/Marxists/Obama Fascists

. Rather, the Ruling Class/RINO Establishment and the Socialists and MarxoFascists have a common enemy in YOU AND ME; Conservative Tea Partiers.

You have reality bass ackwards here. Sometimes you have to take one for the team.

Your "Team" leadership has SURRENDERED to the MarxoFascists already. They are become nothing but Judenrats for the Regime.

Your line of thinking means SURRENDER to those who have permitted and condoned this subversion and transformation of the Republic into a MarxoFascist State.

184 posted on 02/24/2014 3:51:34 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

More than you apparently.


185 posted on 02/24/2014 11:43:29 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for RINOs is the same as voting for any other Tyrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish
it’s a plan I guess.

Much better than your plan.

Give your girlfriend a little help.

186 posted on 02/24/2014 11:45:11 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for RINOs is the same as voting for any other Tyrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson