From the Encyclopedia Goreannica: Climatology consists of several systems of divination based on the premise that there is a relationship between weather phenomena and events in the human world. Many cultures have attached importance to meteorological events, and... developed elaborate systems for predicting terrestrial events from meteorological observations.
“No Two Sides to Climate Change Debate”
Isn’t that an oxymoron? It is not possible to have a debate unless you have an opposing point of view...
Of course there’s climate change — with every season change — every snowfall, every “Indian Summer”.
So we can not let them get away with calling their global warming BS money-making scheme by any other descriptive name.
Ridicule them/Question them on why the name change and refuse to go along with their games.
If you go to the article at cnn, the comments are GREAT! They all rip can to shreds!
A guy at work was telling me the other day what a good thing it is that Popular Science decided to close its Comments sections forever, because they were getting nutcase comments from flat-earth nutcases. I just shook my head at him.
I would not know.I have not watched CNN in over 15 years.
Freegards
LEX
Warming fanatics have all the characteristics of cultists. It really doesn’t matter how well researchers and cult critics present evidence that refutes cults and their apologetics. If the same research is used twice, the cultists will come back and say it is the same old argument that was wrong to begin with. Without knowing what the research is, or how the critics defend their position, the fanatics dismiss it as old news that didn’t work.
They need to ask Mark Steyn about that. He is on Dr. Mann’s a$$ like white on rice. To the tune of $10 million!