Replies

Looking at the comments at the articles’ link, the libs ARE calling dissent treason.

Dissent is only not treason when it’s the libs dissenting. Got it?

"Republicans call the President a dictator and say his boot is on their necks, he is stomping on the Constitution, he is an “imperial” president. And yet all of them remain free to say these things in public, on TV. There isn’t even any backlash to speak of."

I winder how such a stupid woman earned the academic credentials she apparently has. She cites an example of two - two - people unjustifiably detained during an anti-Bush protest, yet dozens have been arrested during anti-Obama protests (I cited examples on another post).

There was no "fear" to protest during the Bush years - hundreds of thousands did. Dozens of anti-Bush books were written and published, newspapers editorialized against Bush, TV media searched far and wide for any scandal - real or imagined - they could find.

Bush was criticized by Americans abroad during a time of more intense war than what we have now; he was accused of shredding the Constitution, of being a cowboy, of acting unilaterally, of lying us into war, of being complicit in 9/11, and on and on. Many of these allegations were thoroughly investigated and debunked, others were just empty but scurrilous rhetoric. This woman is a nitwit.