Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86

Well, she can still open carry I would think.

And in the law it says “unlawful user or addicted to”.

Seems that she IS a lawful user (in Washington State). If she can show that she is not addicted, then perhaps she can get it looked at again. Something like: “I CAN use Advil for the pain, but it also causes problems like x,y, and z; whereas the pot doesn’t.”


7 posted on 02/21/2014 9:51:45 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve
And in the law it says “unlawful user or addicted to”.

Even if she is not "addicted" (no one is actually addicted to MJ), she is still an unlawful user according to the fed. DENIED!

15 posted on 02/21/2014 10:03:36 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson