Back in post 95 you implied that Sowell’s “conservative card” was being “yanked”. Nobody said anything of the sort; rather it looks to me as if he’s voluntarily turning it in.
Also, bringing up the Founding Fathers minor “compromises” with respect to the Constitution is really a canard. Going further back to what I said in post 88 (about the Founding Fathers ideology), whatever tiny “compromises” exist in the US Constitution has nothing to do with their unified ideology about creating the USA as a republic for a moral and religious people. So thanks for the distractive argument. The Dems continue to be ideologically pure out of the Marxist doctrine they continue to push, and that cannot be denied; the only way to fight them is to return to what the Founding Fathers were all about when it comes to the actual foundation of the USA.
If you think the compromises of the Constitution were “tiny”
then your knowledge of that document’s history could fit up a hog’s
behind. What the Founding Fathers were unified about was that
they were no longer going to be a part of Britain. Much of everything
else was up in the air. Post Revolutionary War there were those who
even wanted G Washington to serve as king of the US.
As to Sowell and anybody else, it is entirely possible to despise
Cruz and be just as conservative as anybody. No one person
corners the market on conservatism. Fall in love with a politician
and be ready for heartbreak. And, yes there are a few posters
who are ready to throw Sowell under the bus on this thread.