[conservaKate]

The oil being transported across government seized land is not destined for US consumption...it will go on the world market...but is primarily aimed for Chinese consumption. I’m not understanding how you think it makes US energy independent.

The amount of jobs created are actually very few and they would be temporary jobs. But I would still be fine with all of that if the pipeline could be built without seizing private property.

I still have never read or heard why Canada is not building the pipeline across their own country. Not being snarky..I’ve just don’t know why they don’t build it in Canada.

I will never understand the logic of taking people’s land away from them when they don’t want to sell it...w/o a compelling...very compelling reason.

[no-to-illegals]

The oil being transported across government seized land is not destined for US consumption...it will go on the world market

First build the pipeline and then see. Oh btw ... what do you have against markets?

[no-to-illegals]

I wonder when men and women will re-secure their rights over those of frogs and mice ... Any thoughts? I know God feeds the sparrows, frogs and mice but God meant for Men and Women to work to feed theirs. Strange world in which the rights of men and women not wanting to work trump the rights of those Men and Women wanting to work.

[no-to-illegals]

The amount of jobs created are actually very few and they would be temporary jobs.

Another two questions for you ... Have you seen what is going on in South Dakota? Are you against economic booms?

[redgolum]

The refineries are in Texas, and Canada doesn’t want them built in Canada.