Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

Weren’t these also, guns that they owned before a new law was made about registration? So first they were not illegal weapons, and now they are?


9 posted on 02/19/2014 2:23:52 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: NEMDF

Correct. Until the law was changed, CT has a law almost identical to the Clinton “Assault Weapons” ban, i.e pistol grip and detachable magazine was legal, but add a bayonet lug and it became illegal. They simply make it one cosmetic feature and banned a bunch by name.

If you owned one before the law was passed, and registered it is apparently a safe “assault weapon.”

And yes, Mallof still claims “overwhelming public support” for this law, so much support, they used a E-Cert to ram it thru.


11 posted on 02/19/2014 2:39:23 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: NEMDF

correct.


19 posted on 02/19/2014 5:28:07 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson