Does this include fireplaces as well?
I built my own wood burning stove with my trusty welder, and over the years it has been modified a few times to improve airflow, and to accommodate cooking. Screw the EPA.
I see a lot of “Ruby Ridges” in our future.
The EPA had better outlaw volcanic eruptions.
One volcano spews more ash, particulates, etc, than a whole decade of wood stoves.
First they ban Edison (lightbulbs) and now Franklin (wood stoves).
Makes me want to get two oil drums and make a stove to heat my North Dakota home.
This is utter nonsense.
The smoke from just one of the wild fires that are cause by the failure to properly harvest and clear our forests will be greater than all of the wood stoves in the country could make in a century.
.
I feel safer already...
Will I have to comply with these EPA mandates if I am burning firearms or aborted fetuses?
Didn’t think so
Patriots do not understand that the states have never delegated to Congress, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate the environment. But even if the states had delegated such powers to the feds, the Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in non-elected federal beaurocrats. So Congress has a constitutional monopoly on federal legislative / regulatory powers whether it wants it or not. And by delegating such powers to non-elected bureaucrats, Congress is wrongly protecting federal legislative powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of the statutes referenced above.
What patriots need to do to get the unconstitutionally big federal government off of their backs is the following imo. Once patriots get themselves up to speed with the federal government's constitutionally limited powers, they need to enlighten state lawmakers, who are probably as constitutionally clueless as the people who elected them, with the federal government's constitutionally limited powers. Then patriots and state lawmakers can work as a team to stop Congress from regulating state power issues, such as the environment, which the feds have no constitutional authority to address.
Note that the states can always amend the Constitution to delegate to Congress the specific power to protect the environment should the states decide that doing so is the best approach to protecting the environment.
Patriots do not understand that the states have never delegated to Congress, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate the environment. But even if the states had delegated such powers to the feds, the Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in non-elected federal beaurocrats. So Congress has a constitutional monopoly on federal legislative / regulatory powers whether it wants it or not. And by delegating such powers to non-elected bureaucrats, Congress is wrongly protecting federal legislative powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of the statutes referenced above.
What patriots need to do to get the unconstitutionally big federal government off of their backs is the following imo. Once patriots get themselves up to speed with the federal government's constitutionally limited powers, they need to enlighten state lawmakers, who are probably as constitutionally clueless as the people who elected them, with the federal government's constitutionally limited powers. Then patriots and state lawmakers can work as a team to stop Congress from regulating state power issues, such as the environment, which the feds have no constitutional authority to address.
Note that the states can always amend the Constitution to delegate to Congress the specific power to protect the environment should the states decide that doing so is the best approach to doing so.