Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/19/2014 8:42:04 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: kristinn

C-pac corksmokers political action committee.


54 posted on 02/19/2014 9:45:15 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

So we are reaching out to gays to take care of An America in their custodies...

Once again, reaching out to parties instead of voters. Another plantation, Democrat, Islamic, communist, terrorist, what have you, owns us.

When in the name of equality they are going to say my sister can be my dad and the government anything it wants?


64 posted on 02/19/2014 9:59:07 AM PST by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Conservative? I think not.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

67 posted on 02/19/2014 10:12:29 AM PST by expatguy (Donate to "An American Expat in SE Asia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn; onyx; All
While I fully accept that a person can be gay and politically conservative, the issue of gay “rights,” per se, is not one that can harmoniously advanced within a conservative ideology.

If a conservative is gay, or otherwise non-heterosexual, they must accept that nearly all issues pertaining to gay rights are reserved for states, and in some cases localities, to address. A Federalist approach requires a rather difficult to imagine discomfort and objection (by gay conservatives) with federal courts throwing out “Defense of Marriage” laws duly passed by the legislative process of a state(s). Could a gay conservative imagine themselves fighting to overturn a federal court's decision to impose gay marriage upon a state by throwing out state laws or amendments which recognize marriage only as a one man and one woman union? It is difficult for me to imagine, I suppose.

Furthermore, the fact that the single identifying mark of this group is their gay sexuality leads me to believe that it is more likely the intent of GOProud to convert the party on issue pertaining to homosexual rights than to advance classical Federalism.

71 posted on 02/19/2014 10:42:58 AM PST by TitansAFC ("I'm not much different from A.Cuomo.I probably agree with him on 98% of the issues." - Gov Christie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

They really need to change their name


72 posted on 02/19/2014 10:43:21 AM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

It is way past time to drop the initial ‘C’ from the organization’s designation. LRPAC for Left Republican PAC.


79 posted on 02/19/2014 10:51:39 AM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

How about any conservative homos who want to attend CPAC do so as conservatives, not homos?

Why does CPAC, or any Pubbie group, have to kowtow to their (homos) sexual proclivities to get their votes?


80 posted on 02/19/2014 10:56:22 AM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Aren’t about 1/2 the “rights” that Gay lobby groups ask for already rights that every citizen in this country already has like the right not to be harassed in our own houses.

The other 1/2 of the “rights” they want are nothing more than “Hedonistic Privlidges” like the so called “right” to parade around Nakked in fron of our children while marching in a “Charade Parade”....

If they want the conservatives to even consider taking them seriously they NEED to drop that 2nd half, the “Hedonistic Publica Display” thing first.


86 posted on 02/19/2014 11:30:29 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Don’t forget that the entire board is pro-Muslim Brotherhood, with Muslim shills Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan.


92 posted on 02/19/2014 11:44:08 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Just when I thought the GOP could not become any more irrelevant they go and prove me wrong and embrace immorality and alienate conservatives even further than they already have.
100 posted on 02/19/2014 12:32:44 PM PST by Manic_Episode (GOP = The Whig Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

we already know these groups hate, and scream at, conservatives and their solutions to this issue.


101 posted on 02/19/2014 12:35:16 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

conservative solutions to the gay issue?

1. we do not ever endorse any immoral activity, whether people have a personal weakness for it or not.

2. we continue to believe and educqte about the dangers of homosexuality, and its destructive lifestyle.

3. we will never endorse tyrrany of the minority for immoral reasons/causes.

4. we endorse no special laws for those engaged in immoral acts, or simply because of who they decide to have sex with.

5. we will work to get homosexualty brought into public schools under the guise of “education”, out of public schools.

6. marriage will and always has been between a man, and a woman. we will never endorse gay marriage. we will work to make anywhere that damages the legal definition of marriage by allowing homosexuals to “marry”, to go bvack to the historical and correct definition of marriage.

7. we will work to correctly identify homosexuality as a mental disorder that requires treatment. you don’t do people any favors telling them a mental illness is awesome and how God wanted you to be.

8. we will push back all forms of sexual immorality eating away at the culture and family.

9. we will once again criminalize perversions of all kinds.

now these are conservative solutions to the homosexuality problem.

we’re not shifting off these positions, if they want compromise, let them come off their positions and shift towards ours.


103 posted on 02/19/2014 12:44:49 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

This why I know deem it “FudgePAC.”


107 posted on 02/19/2014 2:43:13 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

As long as they are not there to preach a liberal agenda or tell people what their values should be, I think I’m okay with them coming.

I believe the big issue was Barron calling people bigots who disagreed with him. Then, Barron went completely overboard in 2013 and endorsed McAuliffe for Gov. of Virginia (This was pointed out on the GayPatriot blog last year).

If they are going over there to PROMOTE a leftist agenda, then I probably would say they shouldn’t go.

Big tent is a two way street. They’re going to have to accept those of us who support traditional marriage.

We’ll have to see what happens.


108 posted on 02/19/2014 3:58:19 PM PST by CountryClassSF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson