Skip to comments.
Why is the Obama Administration Putting Government Monitors in Newsrooms?
aclj.org ^
| February 18, 2014
| Matthew Clark
Posted on 02/18/2014 3:32:28 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
The Obama Administrations Federal Communication Commission (FCC) is poised to place government monitors in newsrooms across the country in an absurdly draconian attempt to intimidate and control the media.
Before you dismiss this assertion as utterly preposterous (we all know how that turned out when the Tea Party complained that it was being targeted by the IRS), this bombshell of an accusation comes from an actual FCC Commissioner.
FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai reveals a brand new Obama Administration program that he fears could be used in pressuring media organizations into covering certain stories.
As Commissioner Pai explains in the Wall Street Journal:
Last May the FCC proposed an initiative to thrust the federal government into newsrooms across the country. With its "Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs," or CIN, the agency plans to send researchers to grill reporters, editors and station owners about how they decide which stories to run. A field test in Columbia, S.C., is scheduled to begin this spring.
The purpose of the CIN, according to the FCC, is to ferret out information from television and radio broadcasters about "the process by which stories are selected" and how often stations cover "critical information needs," along with "perceived station bias" and "perceived responsiveness to underserved populations."
In fact, the FCC is now expanding the bounds of regulatory powers to include newspapers, which it has absolutely no authority over, in its new government monitoring program.
(Excerpt) Read more at aclj.org ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1984; 1stamendment; censorship; demagogicparty; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; freepress; freespeech; impeachnow; memebuilding; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; politicalofficers; singlepartystate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: unixfox
They may deserve it but we don’t. If they don’t stand up for “freedom of the press” then all freedoms will be stomped on. No, I won’t be holding my breath.
61
posted on
02/18/2014 4:25:39 PM PST
by
bgill
To: ilovesarah2012
Don't turn around, oh oh
Der Kommissar's in town, oh oh
He's got the power
And you're so weak
And you're frustration will not let you speak
-PJ
62
posted on
02/18/2014 4:25:54 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: AlexW
63
posted on
02/18/2014 4:25:55 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
To: ilovesarah2012
It’s a commie thing. State controlled “media”. The Nazis did it too.
64
posted on
02/18/2014 4:26:02 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(As government expands, liberty contracts. - President Ronald W. Reagan)
To: Lazamataz
65
posted on
02/18/2014 4:26:45 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: Fresh Wind
> For now, anyway, its still legal to turn off your telescreen.
A few more years into King Barrys Reign of Error, that freedom will just be a distant memory.
Brain implants will be next; indoctrination while you sleep. Join a Tea Party and the kill switch gets activated.
To: onthegulf
I think I’ll take my old Confederate ‘re-enacting uniform to the dry cleaners. It appears I’ll be needing it soon.
67
posted on
02/18/2014 4:31:56 PM PST
by
deputytess
(Men of the West .....stand and FIGHT!)
To: ilovesarah2012
Why do they need Obamaminders? They don’t need to be told what to make news.
Some of them do it for pay anyway.
CNN, PBS and NPR all receive tax dollars for their news performance.
CBSViacom, ABCDisney, and NBCUniversal all willingly slant their news reporting in favor of the regime.
And we are watching Faux cave in realtime.
Your only source of truth is elsewhere.
68
posted on
02/18/2014 4:34:59 PM PST
by
Old Sarge
(TINVOWOOT: There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This)
To: ilovesarah2012
The Soviets called them “The Ministry of Truth”....
69
posted on
02/18/2014 4:35:23 PM PST
by
G Larry
To: ilovesarah2012
does somebody NOW have standing ?
70
posted on
02/18/2014 4:41:50 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(Obama ----> Fredo smart)
To: ilovesarah2012
71
posted on
02/18/2014 4:41:52 PM PST
by
Biggirl
(“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
To: ilovesarah2012
FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai reveals a brand new Obama Administration programHe has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
King Hussein ALERT!
FUBO
72
posted on
02/18/2014 4:50:19 PM PST
by
PGalt
To: ilovesarah2012; Jim Robinson
Yes ladies & gentlemen, it has been done before - the
Editors Law of October 4, 1933
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007655
"Propaganda Ministry officials expected editors and journalists, who had to register with the Reich Press Chamber to work in the field, to follow the mandates and instructions handed down by the ministry. In paragraph 14 of the law, the regime required editors to omit anything calculated to weaken the strength of the Reich abroad or at home.
The Propaganda Ministry aimed further to control the content of news and editorial pages through directives distributed in daily conferences in Berlin and transmitted via the Party propaganda offices to regional or local papers. Detailed guidelines stated what stories could or could not be reported and how to report the news. Journalists or editors who failed to follow these instructions could be fired or, if believed to be acting with intent to harm Germany, sent to a concentration camp. Rather than suppressing news, the Nazi propaganda apparatus instead sought to tightly control its flow and interpretation and to deny access to alternative sources of news."
Tore a page right from the Third Reich playbook.
73
posted on
02/18/2014 4:56:26 PM PST
by
lapsus calami
(What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
To: ilovesarah2012
Yes, and it makes my heart hurt.
While I know freedom as an idea cannot be extinguished, I am so sorry to see it shackled here.
May God share His strength.
Tatt
74
posted on
02/18/2014 4:57:11 PM PST
by
thesearethetimes...
("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." Dorothy Bernard)
To: SandRat
It may be wise to invest in MSNBC...
75
posted on
02/18/2014 4:57:37 PM PST
by
Delta Dawn
(Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
To: ilovesarah2012
Naturally. the Critical Information Needs “ researchers “ will be armed, right?
76
posted on
02/18/2014 4:58:02 PM PST
by
Colorado Doug
(Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
To: ilovesarah2012
And the GOP boot lickers will no doubt provide the FCC very generous funding to do this.
To: ilovesarah2012
Fundamental transformation leads to lawlessness. Lawlessness leads to tyranny.
78
posted on
02/18/2014 4:59:21 PM PST
by
OwenKellogg
(Fundamental transformation sucks.)
To: OwenKellogg
The Republican whores are funding every penny of this.
To: ilovesarah2012
There will be NO more media criticism of your King.
On the morrow, any critic will receive audits,
and then ObamaCARE-related medical-denial
for the cracker's parents and family."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson