Posted on 02/18/2014 2:24:46 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
Make no mistake: Eric Cantor sides with the strong-on-defense wing of the GOP.
In a Presidents Day speech prepared for delivery at the Virginia Military Institute, the House majority leader offers a full-throated rebuke of the isolationist sentiment he says caused the United States to hesitate to enter World War II and again threatens to unleash global horrors.
The speech is aimed at President Barack Obama, accusing him of bungling just about every foreign policy challenge he has faced as commander in chief, from Syrias civil war to the attempt to reset relations with Russia.
Americas friends worry we have lost our way, that we have lost the will to live up to our values or stand up to aggressors, Cantor says in the prepared remarks provided to reporters ahead of the speech Monday. They see a divided, inward-looking America that is focused on its weaknesses rather than its strengths, and they know this is an America that invites challenges and emboldens adversaries.
Cantor also directed a passing rebuke at libertarians in the GOP, whove gained ground in recent years amid a Republican backlash against the policies of former President George W. Bush that led to long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Many Americans, and politicians from both parties, want to believe the tide of war has receded, Cantor says. However, we mustnt let ourselves be lulled into complacency again or forget the lessons of history.
The Virginia Republicans decision to counter the libertarian wing of his party on foreign policy is yet another example of Republican leaders being increasingly willing to stand up to tea party backers like Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), whove pushed for reduced spending on defense.
It also provides a window into the foreign policy rhetoric that can be expected of establishment Republicans running for president in 2016 as they seek to counter the policies of the president on one side and tea party-backed primary challengers on the other.
American foreign policy should not be guided by hollow rhetoric, unwise or moveable timelines, and unenforced red lines, Cantor says. Instead, it should be driven by clear principles: Protect the homeland, defend our allies and advance freedom, democracy and human rights abroad, while maintaining a military superiority that cannot be matched.
He urges Congress to lay the groundwork now for new sanctions against Iran if that nation violates a deal struck last year to freeze parts of its nuclear program. Given the opportunity, he says, Irans leaders would make good on their call to wipe Israel off the map a reference to an infamous statement by the Islamic Republics former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
I can imagine few more destabilizing moments in world history than Iran on the threshold of being a nuclear power, Cantor says. Make no mistake: Iran is a brutal theocracy. Its leaders violently repress dissent at home and support conflict and chaos abroad.
Cantor also says it was a mistake to withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq and calls for some troops to remain in Afghanistan after this year, when U.S. combat operations there are set to come to an end.
In Iraq today, Iran and Al Qaeda are ascendant, and violence has reached levels not seen since the peak of the insurgency, Cantor says. To allow the same thing to happen in Afghanistan would be to invite strategic defeat for the United States.
He acknowledges his approach to foreign policy cannot be done on the cheap and says we cannot continue to blindly reduce defense spending a reference to sequestration, the automatic spending cuts that have hit the Pentagon especially hard.
Initially encouraged by the so-called pivot or rebalance to Asia, our Asian partners are rightfully worried that the rebalance means only that the region will receive a larger slice of a shrinking pie with respect to American attention, military presence and diplomacy, Cantor says.
The White House had no comment Monday on any of Cantors remarks.
His speech comes at an odd time for defense hawks, whove seen their power wane in recent years. A number of longtime defense advocates in both parties have retired, died or been ousted in elections. But it also follows several long-sought victories for congressional defense advocates over the past few months, including Decembers bipartisan budget deal that staves off sequestration for two years and the passage of an omnibus spending bill last month that provides some fiscal certainty for the Pentagon.
Americas military strength
helped spread the promise of democracy to the oppressed, a message of hope to the destitute and the blessings of security to the weak, Cantor says. But today, that formula that has served this nation and the world so well is very much in doubt.
Eric ... he ain't bungled a thing.
“Strong on Defense” and “Defense Spending” are no more correlated than “education” and “education spending”
Much of the DoD is just pork barrel spending anymore.
I’d take away the NSA budget for spying on every American, but by Cantor would say I’m “isolationist”
A little Reaganesque restraint would go a long way.
Cantor tried to get us into a shooting war in Syria on behalf of the Islamists.
This weasel must be removed from GOP leadership.
Let’s see - 89 percent of the American people opposed intervention in Syria. The LAST thing the vast majority want is another Mideast War; the “leadership” is far out of step on this.
And this dork is 2nd in line for Boner’s job.
great. we can trade one loser for another.
So do we let Israel fend for itself while Iran and Syria get nukes?
This is truly acting like a RINO.
“This is NOT being part of “the strong-on-defense wing of the GOP”, because RINOs confuse ‘militarism’ with ‘militancy’, which is almost the same as how Democrats imagine the military.
A ‘militant’ is someone whose concern is to have an effective, efficient military that accomplishes the missions assigned to it with the least loss of life and money. Truly committed to “diplomacy by other means”.
A ‘militarist’, like RINOs, create the worst impulses of “trying to buy victory” with flashy uniforms, improbable technologies, and throwing money at the military to waste. They are the kind of people who measure success in war in tons of bombs dropped, and obsess over enemy body counts.
Most recently, this was done by Lindsey Graham, in a silly effort to look like a “real man” by acting hyper-aggressive and macho. Yes, it was pretty pathetic.
Most importantly, it is *obviously* pandering to what they think the conservative base wants, as contemptuous ingratiation. They obviously don’t believe in such things, or hold military strength as a core value; because truthfully, they don’t really have core values.
For them it is just a campaign sound bite.
The feeling for them it should evoke in the conservative base is just the reaffirmation of contempt we hold for them.
One can oppose foreign aid and further meddling in Syria and Egypt without being an isolationist or a pacifist. Most foreign aid nowadays merely props-up socialism. And the current “regimes” in Egypt and Syria are the lesser of the evil groups that the Obama regime is aiding.
Probably the same one who sent emissaries to negotiate treaties with England, Spain, and France.
Treaties, not alliances.
I’d be a lot less worried about Iranian nukes than the prospect of the existing Pakistani nukes getting into the hands of terrorists. Iran, the so-called worldwide leader of state-sponsored terrorism, has never carried out an attack against American citizens on American soil.
Instead of shaming his countrymen, Cantor should provide an example, enlist, and go forth to spread Democracy, gay marriage and access to the latest Hollywood hit movies to the oppressed peoples of the world.
You didn’t answer the question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.