Are Democratic Presidents Better for Babies?

Livescience.com ^ | February 17, 2014 | Rachael Rettner

[12th_Monkey]

very good point

[12th_Monkey]

I never get tired of that graph

[B4Ranch]

You would need to add in the color qualifier also. Blacks kill a large number of babies before they ever see daylight.

[Idaho_Cowboy]

They probably first tried to tie it to “global warming”, but then that didn’t work, so tried some other concepts until they found one that would show some correlation.

---

I had an economics professor that used to say if you torture the data long enough it will tell you what you want to hear.

[Go_Raiders]

They obviously compared the D President’s rates to the R that preceded him. Then they compared the R president’s rates to the D that followed. Voila!

[Fai Mao]

“Truman and JFK were the only ones since who were even arguably close. And they were both merely mediocre.”

Truman followed FDR who was demonrat. So only Kennedy

[Iron Munro]

Only if the baby can make a sizable contribution to a democrat campaign fund.

[Gene Eric]

The effects of low employment and blackouts.

[SECURE AMERICA]

Having a Democratic president in the United States is linked with a reduction in infant mortality rates, according to a controversial new study.

Oh stop. You are not even funny. So says the millions of aborted babies over the past couple of decades!

[Iron Munro]

[12th_Monkey]

that always helps

[12th_Monkey]

aint that the truth!

[linMcHlp]

I post this because it's laughable. Should a qualifier be added to "IF they survive till birth"