Skip to comments.
Are Democratic Presidents Better for Babies?
Livescience.com ^
| February 17, 2014
| Rachael Rettner
Posted on 02/18/2014 2:03:47 PM PST by 12th_Monkey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
I post this because it's laughable. Should a qualifier be added to "IF they survive till birth" I'm sure the same people crunching the numbers can find some study somewhere that states chicken #h!t is a better and healthier substitute for peanut butter.
Wag your head and enjoy this liberal inspired pile of dung.
To: 12th_Monkey
"IF they survive till birth" And, if they do happen to make it (what is it, 25% chance in some leftist cities?), nothing like being immediately $300,000 in debt.
2
posted on
02/18/2014 2:06:38 PM PST
by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: 12th_Monkey
They probably first tried to tie it to “global warming”, but then that didn’t work, so tried some other concepts until they found one that would show some correlation.
3
posted on
02/18/2014 2:06:40 PM PST
by
NEMDF
To: 12th_Monkey
Having a Democratic president in the United States is linked with a reduction in infant mortality rates, according to a controversial new study. That could be because a preemie that you don't try to save is not counted as an infant death.
If you try to save them and they die, then it is counted as "infant mortality."
Just another way bureaucrats play with numbers.
4
posted on
02/18/2014 2:06:40 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
To: FReepers
![Hosted by imgur.com](http://i.imgur.com/AXTaNM7.jpg)
Click The Pic To Donate
Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can
5
posted on
02/18/2014 2:08:44 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: 12th_Monkey
'E search for a reseach grant, that's all.
6
posted on
02/18/2014 2:08:56 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
good point.
Numbers can be manipulated easily and the run of the mill consumer who reads that article will buy into it without a second thought.
7
posted on
02/18/2014 2:09:31 PM PST
by
12th_Monkey
(One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
To: C210N
thats about the size of it.
8
posted on
02/18/2014 2:10:12 PM PST
by
12th_Monkey
(One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
To: NEMDF
9
posted on
02/18/2014 2:10:46 PM PST
by
12th_Monkey
(One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
To: 12th_Monkey
When a Berkley professor critcizes a study like that you know it is in trouble.
10
posted on
02/18/2014 2:11:22 PM PST
by
amnestynone
(Lindsey Graham is feckless, duplicitous, treacherous, double dealing backstabbing Corksucker.)
To: skinkinthegrass
study brought to you by the DNC, george soros and public broadcasting.....
11
posted on
02/18/2014 2:12:01 PM PST
by
12th_Monkey
(One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
To: amnestynone
oops, must have missed that. I expected the study to have fallen out the butt of some Berkley moon bat.
12
posted on
02/18/2014 2:13:19 PM PST
by
12th_Monkey
(One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: 12th_Monkey
Gee - I wonder if the highly negative partisan press creating an atmosphere of doom and gloom may cause extra complications...
Or if having a less baby-killing man in the white house would lead to more at-risk pregnancies being brought to term...
Crap science is crap.
14
posted on
02/18/2014 2:16:18 PM PST
by
MortMan
(Is a delayed shower a "stay of exablution"?)
To: 12th_Monkey
It all depends on what the meaning of the word “babies” is, doesn’t it?
15
posted on
02/18/2014 2:17:32 PM PST
by
RichInOC
(2013-14 Tiber Swim Team)
To: 12th_Monkey
Number like these sound quite plausible...
![](http://www.venganza.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/hq-graphcopy2_800.jpg)
16
posted on
02/18/2014 2:19:12 PM PST
by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: 12th_Monkey
17
posted on
02/18/2014 2:20:56 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: 12th_Monkey
Another bunch of crap and lies.
18
posted on
02/18/2014 2:22:42 PM PST
by
mulligan
(I)
To: MortMan
Yep, garbage in garbage out.
19
posted on
02/18/2014 2:22:44 PM PST
by
12th_Monkey
(One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
To: 12th_Monkey
The last Democrat president who was a significant improvement on his GOP opponent was Grover Cleveland.
Truman and JFK were the only ones since who were even arguably close. And they were both merely mediocre.
20
posted on
02/18/2014 2:22:55 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson