To: ConservativeMan55
So if they’re using Federal Dollars to purchase private plans how is this any different than Obamacare?
2 posted on
02/18/2014 11:56:07 AM PST by
ConservativeMan55
(In America, we don't do pin pricks. But sometimes we elect them.)
To: ConservativeMan55; Sub-Driver
3 posted on
02/18/2014 11:57:47 AM PST by
ConservativeMan55
(In America, we don't do pin pricks. But sometimes we elect them.)
To: ConservativeMan55
From the article:
Conservatives liked the idea that private option patients would access their health care through insurance plans like Blue Cross and Blue Shield, as opposed to the traditional government-run Medicaid program, which many Republicans feel is inefficient and offers first poor-quality care.
4 posted on
02/18/2014 12:03:10 PM PST by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: ConservativeMan55
Because part of Obamacare was to increase Medicaid rolls ... a lot.
9 posted on
02/18/2014 12:20:21 PM PST by
Lorianne
(fedgov, taxporkmoney)
To: ConservativeMan55
Maybe it’s cheaper than going through the 0’JarrettCare/DNC/Socialist/Marxist slush fund filter? Maybe not much, but perhaps a bit?
I imagine we could’ve bought ALL of the *gap* uncovered’s private policies for a lot cheaper than what 0DeathCare is costing.
12 posted on
02/18/2014 12:25:29 PM PST by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson