Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yoe
Holder just has his panties in a wad because a huge number of "his people" are criminals, drug dealers, and general undesirables.

Why should we - the decent, law-abiding, Constitution- loving citizens of America - allow the worst in our society to vote? It's bad enough legions of Holder's parasites without obvious felonious criminal records get to vote themselves and their enablers into office anyhow when all they want is more free sh!t and somebody to give it to them.

Allowing any of these people within 150 feet of a voting booth is like eating tapeworm sandwiches for nourishment.

17 posted on 02/18/2014 8:13:31 AM PST by Gritty (Inside every liberal is a totalitarian screaming to get out! - David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gritty
So an election is held and 100 of the voters are felons, and the winning candidate wins by 50 votes. Won't everyone be pleased that felons determined the outcome of the election?

Something along those lines happened when Jim Webb beat George Allen for the Senate seat in VA. Apparently the Muslim vote in Virginia went heavily for Webb, and it was very close, so they put Webb over the top. Of course I'm not saying that Muslims are like felons.

The proportion of blacks serving prison sentences may actually be lower than the percentage of crimes committed by black criminals because of black victims being afraid to testify ("no snitching").

22 posted on 02/18/2014 11:24:06 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson