To: INVAR
What else does the GOP have to run on?
33 posted on
02/16/2014 4:19:16 PM PST by
ex-snook
(God is Love)
To: ex-snook; INVAR; hal ogen; rbg81; Viennacon; BenLurkin; scbison; F15Eagle; Jim Robinson; ...
What else does the GOP have to run on? Well, let's look at the things that they allow:
- Fast & Furious
- State sponsored terrorism.
The non-action on any meaningful consequence/punishment, individually or corporately is condoning the arming of the cartels, which we know are definitionally terrorists. - Treason
Given the above, the actions the BATFE/FBI/ICE/DEA engaged in was providing aid and support to the enemies of the several states. - Violation of International Treaty
There are treaties with Mexico we have which cover the import/export of arms — this operation
is violatave of at least one.
- Eligibility Ambiguities
The allowance of Obama to assume the role of President with the ambiguities respecting the eligibility shows a disregard for the law, the integrity of the elective-process, and the integrity of the chain of command of all branches of the military. - Endless Debt Incurrance
This shows that they are perfectly onboard with selling the general population, and their children/grand-children/great-grandchildren/..., into slavery; as this is guaranteed by the taxes we/they will pay — and you cannot refuse to pay. - Benghazi
This shows that they are perfectly comfortable with the official betrayal of agents both military and civil — what makes you think they won't betray you? - Gun Control
The Republican party is like Texas: all talk and no action. This is especially true with gun control: Texas allows restrictions on concealed carry, to the point that driving with a firearm that is accessible [i.e. not in the trunk/locked-case] can be considered a violation. Likewise the Republican party does not fight against current gun control law [this is illustrated by the Clinton Assault-Weapons Ban, where they take credit for its termination… something where they had to literally do nothing, as the legislation had a sunset clause]. - Mitt Romney
The party pushed Mr of course I support abortion in the case of rape, incest, or the "mother's health"
Romney… even as they added the no exceptions to the party's platform-plank against abortion. [They will never vigorously push against this infanticide, just like they will never push against extant gun-control — they cannot allow it because to do so would remove their ability to scare-monger votes out of it.]
104 posted on
02/16/2014 7:30:06 PM PST by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson