Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

More on (moron?) the cost of free energy and initiatives. (Hey, lets fry up some birds down in southern NV.)
1 posted on 02/16/2014 8:41:34 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

This is very interesting.

However, I wonder if the liberals will consider any such review of power costs?? Or will they push ahead with their mantras of solar, wind, no fossil fuels, no nuclear etc.

Unfortunately liberals are in charge now, so we have to wonder what the liberals will allow to go forward. Obama’s EPA is supposed to push policies which will compel many coal fired power plants to close. How we will make up the gap in power generation being lost is unknown.


2 posted on 02/16/2014 8:45:31 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego (we')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I’m surprised that wind, with its maintenance intensive rotating mechanical systems, is cheaper than a photovoltaic array.


3 posted on 02/16/2014 8:47:15 AM PST by null and void (<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

From the article:
“...The power grid is a jealous bitch and there’s not an iota of storage...”
-
Some seem to fail to understand this very basic fact.


7 posted on 02/16/2014 9:23:17 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This is good data for the most part, thanks for posting it. Understanding the energy mix requires acquiring some basic knowledge, which most FReepers are reluctant to do, preferring instead to just repeat talking points or other nonsense. But this is a serious issue, because the only energy policy that makes sense is an “all the above” policy.

We need a mix of dispatchable and non-dispatchable generation sources, which means nuclear and combined-cycle natural gas in addition to those like coal that keep the lights on today.

Where the author loses credibility is where he starts blathering about dusting solar panels and wind turbine maintenance. He simply doesn’t know what he’s talking about and demeans the rest of his argument by delving into nonsensical speculation. He also fails to point out what I have said on just about every wind-related thread, that is, that utility-scale wind generation can operate on a cost-competitive basis without subsidies. The industry trade newspaper even carried a front-page story to the same effect last month. The technology is not all that different from that used to whisk people around the sky at 500 mph yet you don’t hear jet aircraft being described in the same pejorative terms.

But it really matters little what opinionated writes say about it - science and technology will advance at it’s own pace, given a free market in which to operate where the best solutions will succeed.


8 posted on 02/16/2014 9:32:32 AM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Production Tax Credit.

Keep that Wind Generation Lobby money flowing.


13 posted on 02/16/2014 9:52:28 AM PST by hadaclueonce (Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson