Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Svartalfiar

Well then! If anyone can declare being either a man or a woman by simple assertion, then there’s no “need” for “gay” marriage. Any couple of XX’s or XY’s can toss a coin to decide who’ll be the bride and who’ll be the groom.


8 posted on 02/15/2014 3:24:53 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (This is brilliant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

The recent alumni publication I received from Trinity University of San Antonio, TX, listed, in the “Alumni News,” more than one man + man “marriage.” That doesn’t mean they were “married” in Texas, of course.


9 posted on 02/15/2014 3:28:10 PM PST by Tax-chick (The future is not going to take us seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Exactly. You can call it what you want, but you have to change the definition of the word to call it marriage in my book.


29 posted on 02/15/2014 4:21:53 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson