Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

Because the compact would become effective only when it encompasses states collectively possessing a majority of the electoral votes, the presidential candidate receiving the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia would be guaranteed enough electoral votes in the Electoral College to be elected to the Presidency.

No single state would ever be likely to unilaterally enact a law awarding its electoral votes to the nationwide winner. For one thing, such an action would give the voters of all the other states a voice in the selection of the state’s own presidential electors, while not giving the enacting state the benefit of a voice in the selection of presidential electors in other states. Moreover, enactment of such a law in a single state would encourage the presidential candidates to ignore the enacting state. Such unilateral action would not guarantee achievement of the goal of nationwide popular election of the President.


108 posted on 02/16/2014 9:32:09 AM PST by mvymvy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: mvymvy
What do you say about the facts in the graphics from the 2012 election in post 87?

The National Popular Vote is reallyy about letting the cities of Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Boston choose the president. The rest of the country won't count at all.

Is that what you are endorsing?

-PJ

113 posted on 02/16/2014 11:12:56 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson